We saw a hard-to-reproduce runtime regression in SPEC Leslie3 that was
due the field Prefer_Fuse not being initialized in an instance of
the DO_LOOP_INFO class that was constructed with:
DO_LOOP_INFO::DO_LOOP_INFO(DO_LOOP_INFO *dli, MEM_POOL *pool)
I attached a patch to fix this problem.
Also I
1. Yes, we should be able to generalize and handle non-struct return
cases too. However, the patch is well-tested as-is so I would prefer
to make that improvement as a separate change and do more testing.
2. add_fake_parm creates a new VCALL with return type of void, so it
will not add another fa
Author: meiye
Date: 2011-05-17 15:32:07 -0400 (Tue, 17 May 2011)
New Revision: 3608
Modified:
trunk/osprey/be/opt/opt_proactive.cxx
trunk/osprey/be/opt/opt_proactive.h
Log:
Change interface for function calls returning 2 values. CR: Sun Chan
Modified: trunk/osprey/be/opt/opt_proactive.cxx
=
Hi David,
I looked at those code. I have some concerns on this implementations.
1. in wgen_decl.cxx/wgen_expr.cxx, the code only remove Mreturn.bar9_temp_0
if
Need_Hidden_Parameter return true, which need first fake argument.
Should we also remove temp_0 for the case that the return
