Ooops, forgot to add "CR: Sun Chan".
I just used "svn propedit" to add this.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: s...@open64.net [mailto:s...@open64.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 6:26 PM
To: open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Open64-devel] r3901 - trunk/osprey/linux/make
Autho
Author: dgilmore
Date: 2012-04-03 21:26:04 -0400 (Tue, 03 Apr 2012)
New Revision: 3901
Modified:
trunk/osprey/linux/make/gcommonrules
Log:
To fix library dependency problems, the
rule make_libdeps for X8664 is now the same as NVISA.
Modified: trunk/osprey/linux/make/gcommonrules
=
Sounds good with me -- thanks,
Doug
> -Original Message-
> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 5:54 PM
> To: Gilmore, Doug
> Cc: open64-devel
> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] Query on dependencies for libraries
>
> let's go with the simpler one. If oth
let's go with the simpler one. If other arch have problem, we fix it
Sun
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Gilmore, Doug wrote:
> We noticed that header file dependencies in the library builds
> were not working when building shared objects.
>
> This is a problem with the make_libdeps rule.
>
> I c
Author: dgilmore
Date: 2012-04-03 20:50:16 -0400 (Tue, 03 Apr 2012)
New Revision: 3900
Modified:
trunk/osprey/be/cg/x8664/cg_sched.cxx
Log:
This change fixes a bug in DSP_SCH::Compute_Insn_Size().
Some operations have an opcode variant which assume that rax/eax is an
operand/result. Thus when
Author: dgilmore
Date: 2012-04-03 20:48:58 -0400 (Tue, 03 Apr 2012)
New Revision: 3899
Modified:
trunk/osprey/be/cg/x8664/ebo_special.cxx
Log:
This patch fixes initializations of several MEM_POOLs in
ebo_special.cxx, which eliminates many memory pool initialization
trace warnings when the compi
We noticed that header file dependencies in the library builds
were not working when building shared objects.
This is a problem with the make_libdeps rule.
I can think of two options:
1) The definition of this rule for NVISA seems to be appropriate for
X8664. I attached the patch for this change
ok, i am fine with the change
Sun
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Gilmore, Doug wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:39 PM
>> To: Gilmore, Doug
>> Cc: open64-devel
>> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] review request -- CG
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:39 PM
> To: Gilmore, Doug
> Cc: open64-devel
> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] review request -- CG
>
> looks fine with ebo fix.
Thanks!
> for the other fix, shouldn't that be inside
> x8664? Or
