Re: [Open64-devel] Review request: fixing issues when building the compiler as 64-bit binaries

2012-08-10 Thread Sun Chan
someone still need to code review, I thought what we agreed is that the additional id is useful Sun On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Gilmore, Doug wrote: > The field should only be referenced in debugging output. > > Along with Jian-Xin's use case, it is also useful tracking > down the source of

Re: [Open64-devel] Review request: fixing issues when building the compiler as 64-bit binaries

2012-08-10 Thread Gilmore, Doug
The field should only be referenced in debugging output. Along with Jian-Xin's use case, it is also useful tracking down the source of WHIRL differences when building with different builds of the compiler 32/64-bit and/or release/debug. Note that functionality is already there, but you have to ch

Re: [Open64-devel] Open64-devel Digest, Vol 69, Issue 8

2012-08-10 Thread Siddhartha Jana
Thanks a lot for the help. Also, thanks for directing me towards the slides on *points-to* analysis. They are really helpful Sincerely, Siddhartha Jana University of Houston On 9 August 2012 23:08, wrote: > Send Open64-devel mailing list submissions to > open64-devel@lists.sourceforge