> -Original Message-
> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 2:56 PM
> To: Gilmore, Doug
> Cc: open64-devel
> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] Fix to bug 917
>
> The BE uses the same const fold in simplifier.
> to include s
Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Gilmore, Doug wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:37 AM
>> To: Gilmore, Doug
>> Cc: open64-devel
>> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] Fix to bug 917
>
, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Gilmore, Doug wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:37 AM
>> To: Gilmore, Doug
>> Cc: open64-devel
>> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] Fix to bug 917
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:37 AM
> To: Gilmore, Doug
> Cc: open64-devel
> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] Fix to bug 917
>
> which part of const_fold functions do you intend to use? Or are you
which part of const_fold functions do you intend to use? Or are you
writing your own? Note also that you will need to observe IEEE
settings for floats
Sun
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Gilmore, Doug wrote:
> Other Fortran front ends are capable of folding calls to intrinsics that
> have consta
Other Fortran front ends are capable of folding calls to intrinsics that
have constant arguments in parameter statements, but this functionality
is missing in the Open64 front end.
As a first cut, I went to the process of handling this for the real
intrinsic. The patch and test case is attached.
