Re: [OpenAFS] Supported Platforms

2003-04-02 Thread Edward Moy
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 02:37 PM, Henry B. Hotz wrote: Did anyone ever get the server working on OSX? I don't want to run a server on a laptop, but maybe that would be easier for a proof-of-concept test. Yes, it did require a bit of work to get it to function at all. I made some o

Re: [OpenAFS] Supported Platforms

2003-04-02 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Henry B. Hotz wrote: > Did anyone ever get the server working on OSX? I don't want to run a > server on a laptop, but maybe that would be easier for a > proof-of-concept test. I think the answer was "if you used ufs instead of hfs+(?) it worked". I run a server on my laptop

Re: [OpenAFS] Supported Platforms

2003-04-02 Thread Henry B. Hotz
Did anyone ever get the server working on OSX? I don't want to run a server on a laptop, but maybe that would be easier for a proof-of-concept test. At 4:02 PM -0500 4/2/03, Jim Rees wrote: The macppc_nbsd support is preliminary, untested, and in fact guaranteed not to work. Well, I knew that!

Re: [OpenAFS] Supported Platforms

2003-04-02 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Love wrote: > The netbsd openafs code work just fine, if you use it as a server only. > Same with FreeBSD, in fact, I run a cell using FreeBSD (and Solaris) > fileservers. As far as I know the FreeBSD client also works (at least on the CVS head, and in daily snapshots) ___

Re: [OpenAFS] Supported Platforms

2003-04-02 Thread Love
Jim Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The i386_nbsd code doesn't even work, so fixing that would be a good first > step toward getting ppc_nbsd going. It shouldn't be hard, the pieces are > all there, and i386_nbsd worked at one time in the Transarc code base. It > just takes someone with time

Re: [OpenAFS] Supported Platforms

2003-04-02 Thread Jim Rees
The macppc_nbsd support is preliminary, untested, and in fact guaranteed not to work. I probably shouldn't have even committed it, but I thought it might make a good starting point for someone, and I didn't want Love's hard work to be wasted. The param files have several obvious problems. They h

[OpenAFS] hi

2003-04-02 Thread VENKATA ACHANTA
Hi all, We have been looking at AFS-2.03 written by Norbert E. Grüner. AFS-2.03 is a Perl interface to AFS programming APIs which can be downloaded from CPAN.org We have been adding test cases to the API using the Test::Harness and Test::Simple, and are considering enhancing and extending it, a

[OpenAFS] AFS-2.03 Test cases Added anyone intrested?

2003-04-02 Thread VENKATA ACHANTA
Hi all, We have been looking at AFS-2.03 written by Norbert E. Grüner AFS-2.03 is a Perl interface to AFS programming APIs which can be downloaded from CPAN.org We have been adding test cases to the API using the Test::Harness and Test::Simple, and are considering enhancing and extending it, and

Re: [OpenAFS] Supported Platforms

2003-04-02 Thread Love
"Henry B. Hotz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, I upgraded to NetBSD/macppc 1.6Q of March 25. I'm using the 3-16 > OpenAFS snapshot still, with the minor patches you provided and a > couple of trivial/obvious others of my own. > > Now it crashes/burns in src/lwp because it can't assemble proces

Re: [OpenAFS] Supported Platforms

2003-04-02 Thread Derrick J Brashear
You people and your wide-replies... Anyhow, On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Henry B. Hotz wrote: > Now it crashes/burns in src/lwp because it can't assemble process.s. > > What's going on here? Why does the Darwin port not require an > assembly file the way the 368 and alpha netbsd entries do? How can > w

Re: [OpenAFS] Supported Platforms

2003-04-02 Thread Henry B. Hotz
OK, I upgraded to NetBSD/macppc 1.6Q of March 25. I'm using the 3-16 OpenAFS snapshot still, with the minor patches you provided and a couple of trivial/obvious others of my own. Now it crashes/burns in src/lwp because it can't assemble process.s. What's going on here? Why does the Darwin por

Re: [OpenAFS] Connection timed out?

2003-04-02 Thread Michael Robokoff
We are having a similar problem on some of our machines. It seems some of our machines time out on file transfers but lookup access seems fine. --Mike John Koyle wrote: I have about 6 volumes on a server and have a separate server that has readonly replicas of those volumes. Call them a, a.b, a.

Re: [OpenAFS] ticket lifetime

2003-04-02 Thread Nathan Neulinger
We patch our kinit to add processing of the lifetime option. It doesn't do this by default as far as I know, which is why you get the 10h ones. Patch is similar to Ken Hornstein's one in the migration kit. It's available at /afs/umr.edu/software/krb5src/umr.diff. -- Nathan On Wed, 2003-04-02 at

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS 1.2.8 fileserver Failing in GetClient()

2003-04-02 Thread Nathan Neulinger
There was a patch to this area of the code applied yesterday I believe to do with a locking race condition that should be in rc5. -- Nathan On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 03:26, Rainer Toebbicke wrote: > Doug, > > we had a number of crashes in GetClient()/'assertion failed' at the end of > last year tha

[OpenAFS] ticket lifetime

2003-04-02 Thread Christian Ospelkaus
Hello everybody, thanks to Sam Hartman's debian packages, I got started really quickly. I have openafs-1.2.8 running on one server and one client with a MIT krb5 kdc. I have managed to increase the ticket lifetime by increasing the maxlife of the user principals, of krbtgt/... and of the afs en