Re: [OpenAFS] flock() behavior openafs-1.2.11

2004-10-29 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, David Thompson wrote: The ACLs on the directory give this user read acess but no write. Like I said, the openafs code is the same on both boxes. Has anyone seen anything like this? Is this a kernel change? Perchance does one support 64 bit locks (F_GETLK64) and the other doesn

[OpenAFS] flock() behavior openafs-1.2.11

2004-10-29 Thread David Thompson
I'm wondering if anyone can shed any light on a difference in flock() behavior that we're seeing between a couple of systems. The first box is a Red Hat 9 computer (kernel 2.4.20-30.9smp). The second one runs Tao linux (a RHEL rebuild; kernel 2.4.21-15.0.4.TL). Both are running openafs 1.2.1

[OpenAFS] Token Loss

2004-10-29 Thread Michael Robokoff
We have a strange problem here. We have some servers that run scripts to authenticate and recently the tokens for the machines started disappearing. Can some one tell me where I can find the authentication logs, that might help figure this out. Thanks --Mike __

Re: [OpenAFS] Pro's & Con's of /usr/local on AFS....

2004-10-29 Thread Sergio Gelato
* Derek Atkins [2004-10-28 00:18:36 -0400]: > requires stat'ing the directory which has always been a no-no > in /afs... With dynroot it's a bit better, but it's still an issue > if you're not using dynroot. I think you meant to write "fakestat" instead of "dynroot".

Re: [OpenAFS] Pro's & Con's of /usr/local on AFS....

2004-10-29 Thread Norman P. B. Joseph
Excuse me for being dense, (and I was in one of those Transarc training classes back in the day), but what's the harm in that symbolic link? -norm On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 11:34, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Jim Rees wrote: > > > '/afs/isis' is a symbolic link, leading to a

[OpenAFS] debuging

2004-10-29 Thread Michael Robokoff
Is there a way to get more (debugging) information from the ka-forwarder or the authentication server? --Mike ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.3.73

2004-10-29 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Lars Schimmer wrote: Derrick J Brashear schrieb: Right now OpenAFS 1.3.73 on WindowsXP sp2 runs fine, much better than 1.3.71 or 1.3.72, which crashed >6 times a day. Did you file a bug report about these crashes? Jeffrey Altman ___ OpenAFS-info mailing

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.3.73

2004-10-29 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Lars Schimmer wrote: Right now OpenAFS 1.3.73 on WindowsXP sp2 runs fine, much better than 1.3.71 or 1.3.72, which crashed >6 times a day. Sure, but this is about Linux; On Windows, 1.3.73 is what you want, unqualified. ___ OpenAFS

[OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.3.73

2004-10-29 Thread Lars Schimmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Derrick J Brashear schrieb: | Don't CC me on replies. I read openafs-info. | | On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: | |> Is 1.3.x getting relatively close to being stable? (aka, I won't lose |> data). Would you recommend I use the 2.6 or 2.4 ker

Re: [OpenAFS] IPUT Bad refCount 0 on inode 0xf8abadb8 in openafs-1.2.11

2004-10-29 Thread Derrick J Brashear
Don't CC me on replies. I read openafs-info. On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: Is 1.3.x getting relatively close to being stable? (aka, I won't lose data). Would you recommend I use the 2.6 or 2.4 kernels if I move to 1.3.x? If you're going to move, you'll probably want (not yet released

Re: [OpenAFS] IPUT Bad refCount 0 on inode 0xf8abadb8 in openafs-1.2.11

2004-10-29 Thread Troy Benjegerdes
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 02:00:36PM -0400, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > >I've had this happen twice now on an SMP machine (debian 2.4.27 kernel, > >1.2.11 openafs packages from debian sarge) > > > >Is this a known bug that's fixed in a newer version?

Re[2]: [OpenAFS] win32 client 1.3.73

2004-10-29 Thread Ron Croonenberg
Hello Gabe, that almost sounds like the symptoms I experience with an AFS server that I set up not too long ago. When you look at the properties of that mapped drive, does it say it is "RAW" instead of "AFS" ? Ron >Gabe\ wrote: > >> Hello, >> I have been running OpenAFS 1.2.10 on redhat 8 for

Re: [OpenAFS] Pro's & Con's of /usr/local on AFS....

2004-10-29 Thread Todd M. Lewis
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: [...] Don't use them in [...] email messages [...]. Otherwise you _will_ regret it later. Yup. I sure do regret putting one in the email to this list that lit the fuse on this discussion. My mozilla's "delete" button is 'bout wore out. -- +-

[OpenAFS] 1.3.x oops

2004-10-29 Thread Andrej Filipcic
Hi, with openafs cvs from 20.10 I got an oops on 2.6.9 kernel (gentoo). It happens after reading about 1/2 of 1Gb file, several times on 2 different machines. Any idea what is wrong? Cheers, Andrej Oct 27 00:24:42 af rxi_AllocPacket error<1>Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual

[OpenAFS] BAD ADDRESS ON file operations

2004-10-29 Thread vinod kumar boppana
  hai all, I am getting problem with the openafs version on digital unix(alpha) systems version 4.0f i used alpha_dux40 binaries as client on digital unix version 4.0f . the installation procedure worked fine and afs is loaded. but i am getting the followinf two problems. 1. i am unable