On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, David Thompson wrote:
The ACLs on the directory give this user read acess but no write.
Like I said, the openafs code is the same on both boxes.
Has anyone seen anything like this? Is this a kernel change?
Perchance does one support 64 bit locks (F_GETLK64) and the other doesn
I'm wondering if anyone can shed any light on a difference in flock() behavior
that we're seeing between a couple of systems. The first box is a Red Hat 9
computer (kernel 2.4.20-30.9smp). The second one runs Tao linux (a RHEL
rebuild; kernel 2.4.21-15.0.4.TL). Both are running openafs 1.2.1
We have a strange problem here. We have some servers that run scripts to
authenticate and recently the tokens for the machines started disappearing.
Can some one tell me where I can find the authentication logs, that might
help figure this out.
Thanks
--Mike
__
* Derek Atkins [2004-10-28 00:18:36 -0400]:
> requires stat'ing the directory which has always been a no-no
> in /afs... With dynroot it's a bit better, but it's still an issue
> if you're not using dynroot.
I think you meant to write "fakestat" instead of "dynroot".
Excuse me for being dense, (and I was in one of those Transarc training
classes back in the day), but what's the harm in that symbolic link?
-norm
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 11:34, Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Jim Rees wrote:
>
> > '/afs/isis' is a symbolic link, leading to a
Is there a way to get more (debugging) information from the ka-forwarder or
the authentication server?
--Mike
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Lars Schimmer wrote:
Derrick J Brashear schrieb:
Right now OpenAFS 1.3.73 on WindowsXP sp2 runs fine, much better than
1.3.71 or
1.3.72, which crashed >6 times a day.
Did you file a bug report about these crashes?
Jeffrey Altman
___
OpenAFS-info mailing
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Lars Schimmer wrote:
Right now OpenAFS 1.3.73 on WindowsXP sp2 runs fine, much better than 1.3.71
or
1.3.72, which crashed >6 times a day.
Sure, but this is about Linux; On Windows, 1.3.73 is what you want,
unqualified.
___
OpenAFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derrick J Brashear schrieb:
| Don't CC me on replies. I read openafs-info.
|
| On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
|
|> Is 1.3.x getting relatively close to being stable? (aka, I won't lose
|> data). Would you recommend I use the 2.6 or 2.4 ker
Don't CC me on replies. I read openafs-info.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Is 1.3.x getting relatively close to being stable? (aka, I won't lose
data). Would you recommend I use the 2.6 or 2.4 kernels if I move to
1.3.x?
If you're going to move, you'll probably want (not yet released
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 02:00:36PM -0400, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> >I've had this happen twice now on an SMP machine (debian 2.4.27 kernel,
> >1.2.11 openafs packages from debian sarge)
> >
> >Is this a known bug that's fixed in a newer version?
Hello Gabe,
that almost sounds like the symptoms I experience with an AFS server that I set
up not too long ago. When you look at the properties of that mapped drive, does
it say it is "RAW" instead of "AFS" ?
Ron
>Gabe\ wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I have been running OpenAFS 1.2.10 on redhat 8 for
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
[...] Don't use them in [...] email messages [...].
Otherwise you _will_ regret it later.
Yup. I sure do regret putting one in the email to this list that lit the
fuse on this discussion. My mozilla's "delete" button is 'bout wore out.
--
+-
Hi,
with openafs cvs from 20.10 I got an oops on 2.6.9 kernel (gentoo). It happens
after reading about 1/2 of 1Gb file, several times on 2 different machines.
Any idea what is wrong?
Cheers,
Andrej
Oct 27 00:24:42 af rxi_AllocPacket error<1>Unable to handle kernel paging
request at virtual
hai all,
I am getting problem with the openafs version on digital unix(alpha) systems version
4.0f
i used alpha_dux40 binaries as client on digital unix version 4.0f .
the installation procedure worked fine and afs is loaded.
but i am getting the followinf two problems.
1. i am unable
15 matches
Mail list logo