0 is infinity.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Elliott
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 11:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Derek T. Yarnell
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Number of user groups one can create
>
>
>
> On Nov 22, 200
On 22-Nov-2004 Derrick J Brashear wrote:
| On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Erwin Broschinski wrote:
|
|> No hint in /var/adm/messages or syslog
|> No core :^((
|
| coredumpsize ulimited in the bosserver's parent?
coredumpsize was set to 0! Strange. although I had some cores from about a
week ago.
Yes, th
On Sunday, November 21, 2004 23:24:43 +0100 Sergio Gelato
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cannot determine sys_call_table status. assuming it isn't exported
A quick look in /usr/src/linux gave me the impression (I'll double-check)
that gentoo-dev-sources does export this. Shows up as "D" in my
System.
On Nov 22, 2004, at 12:35 PM, Derek T. Yarnell wrote:
I thought there was some upper limit on the number of groups a user can
create in the pts database. I can not seem to find it in the
documentation now. Does anyone know what this is? Is there anyway
around
the it?
From my testing it seems like
It may still be a problem with the stack, just moved to a different location.
That ptch did not fix the problem that ubik_CallIter is being called with
the wrong number of parameters. So can you try this instead? I believe
it changes all the calls to use the correct number of parameters i.e. 19.
J
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Derek T. Yarnell wrote:
I thought there was some upper limit on the number of groups a user can
create in the pts database. I can not seem to find it in the
documentation now. Does anyone know what this is? Is there anyway around
the it?
From my testing it seems like 20.
pts se
Hi all,
After applying Christof's suggested patches OpenAFS 1.3.74 builds for
me, and klog works, but all attempts at examining my cell's root volume
(e.g., fs examine /afs/) result in hangs, segmentation faults, or other
bizarre behavior.
Joe
On 19 Nov, 2004, at 11:08, Christof Hanke wrote:
Do
I thought there was some upper limit on the number of groups a user can
create in the pts database. I can not seem to find it in the
documentation now. Does anyone know what this is? Is there anyway around
the it?
>From my testing it seems like 20.
--
---
Derek T. Yarnell
University of Maryland
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Erwin Broschinski wrote:
No hint in /var/adm/messages or syslog
No core :^((
coredumpsize ulimited in the bosserver's parent?
Just a few of these in FileLog:
Sun Nov 21 21:51:43 2004 FindClient: client a08cd0(6fe8264) already had conn
a0d848 (host nnn), stolen by client a08
Hi
a file server running OpenAFS 1.2.13 standard sun4x_58 on a SUNW,Ultra-250 has
crashed twice within 24 hours after my return from the LISA conference.
(Is this maybe a file server's way to say "hello"?)
No hint in /var/adm/messages or syslog
No core :^((
Nothing in the 2 attached A1000 RAID
The preparations for the AFSIG User Conference and the Hackathon are
in progress. The program is at http://www.afsig.se/ and if you consider
to participate, you really should have signed up by now ;-)
And please, don't be shy because there will be "gurus" around. Look at
the program and you'll fi
* Kevin [2004-11-20 13:10:20 -0500]:
> I'm trying to build version 1.3.74 for ppc_linux26 and having some
> problems.
Same thing but for the i386 counterpart (also Gentoo with 2.6.9).
I should be able to solve it all on my own, but your message happens
to catch me at an early stage in my effort.
Well, that was supposed to be personal to Doug, but I suck. Anyway, what I
was going to say for public consumption was:
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
i think logging ufs reused some inode fields we need, so logging ufs
support is unlikely
So are you saying that logging must be off?
I haven't tested
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
i think logging ufs reused some inode fields we need, so logging ufs
support is unlikely
So are you saying that logging must be off?
The fileserver should probably warn. Actually, though, open source Solaris
may make this al
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
i think logging ufs reused some inode fields we need, so logging ufs
support is unlikely
So are you saying that logging must be off? Should the fileserver
refuse to use a partition with logging turned on or at least fsck should
warn about this? A mod for fsck might be ea
Can you resend this oops after you run it through ksymoops?
-derek
"EC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using a PIII (mono proc) with a Linux 2.4.27 simple vanilla kernel, and
> OpenAFS 1.2.13.
>
> Loading the module works fine. But when I start afsd... I get something like
> indicate
Hi,
I'm using a PIII (mono proc) with a Linux 2.4.27 simple vanilla kernel, and
OpenAFS 1.2.13.
Loading the module works fine. But when I start afsd... I get something like
indicated below. System is very unstable after that (ps -ef cores, so is
top, and machine won't reboot unless I reset it).
17 matches
Mail list logo