Re: [OpenAFS] \\afs\long_cellname Trucated to Netbios Name

2005-02-02 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Jason C. Wells wrote: OpenAFS has been working well for me so I am not up on the latest news. I see that global drive mappings are deprecated. To get with the times, I was looking at using \\afs\cellname as reported in the docs. \\afs\stradamotorports.com is truncated to \\

[OpenAFS] \\afs\long_cellname Trucated to Netbios Name

2005-02-02 Thread Jason C. Wells
OpenAFS has been working well for me so I am not up on the latest news. I see that global drive mappings are deprecated. To get with the times, I was looking at using \\afs\cellname as reported in the docs. \\afs\stradamotorports.com is truncated to \\afs\stradamotors. "stradamotorspors" is t

Re: [OpenAFS] berkeley-db, svn and afs

2005-02-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Hendrik Hoeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to use subversion, but it uses berkeley-db for the repository. > Since berkeley-db uses mmap for locking (right?), in the svn > documentation they write > "As opposed to CVS, subversion is not based on RCS, but rather on the >Berkeley Dat

Re: [OpenAFS] fine-grained incrementals?

2005-02-02 Thread Jeffrey Hutzelman
On Tuesday, February 01, 2005 02:50:04 PM -0500 "John S. Bucy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: looking at src/volser/dumpstuff.c, it appears that dumps are done in ascending vnode order. AFAIK, rename is a first-class operation so it should only dirty the source and dest dirs. Dumps are currently d

Re: [OpenAFS] fine-grained incrementals?

2005-02-02 Thread Jeffrey B. Woodward
Have you considered using my suggestion (private email reply) of trying Subversion (SVN) to manage the binary diffs and to attain a "proper" version management system at the same time? Just curious... -Jeff John S. Bucy wrote: Here's some preliminary data. I'm running the following against my

Re: [OpenAFS] berkeley-db, svn and afs

2005-02-02 Thread Hendrik Hoeth
Thus spake Jeffrey B. Woodward ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > svnadmin create *svn* -fs-type *fsfs > > rather than the default berkeley-db backend. Ah, thanks!! I missed that one -- was looking at a too old version of the svnbook. :-) -- Die gesellschaftliche Konversation waere ein ausgezeichnetes Sc

Re: [OpenAFS] berkeley-db, svn and afs

2005-02-02 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Hendrik Hoeth wrote: Hi, I'd like to use subversion, but it uses berkeley-db for the repository. Since berkeley-db uses mmap for locking (right?), in the svn documentation they write "As opposed to CVS, subversion is not based on RCS, but rather on the Berkeley Database. Make

[OpenAFS] berkeley-db, svn and afs

2005-02-02 Thread Hendrik Hoeth
Hi, I'd like to use subversion, but it uses berkeley-db for the repository. Since berkeley-db uses mmap for locking (right?), in the svn documentation they write "As opposed to CVS, subversion is not based on RCS, but rather on the Berkeley Database. Make sure not to install a repository on

Re: [OpenAFS] fine-grained incrementals?

2005-02-02 Thread John S. Bucy
Here's some preliminary data. I'm running the following against my mail volume hourly: VOL='mail.bucy' mv $VOL $VOL.old && \ vos backup $VOL && \ vos dump $VOL.backup -file $VOL && \ rdiff delta $VOL.sig $VOL $VOL-delta-`date +%Y%m%d.%H%M` && rdiff sig $VOL $VOL.sig && \ rm $VOL.old Here's wha

Re: [OpenAFS] Volume creation tool

2005-02-02 Thread Jeff Blaine
You may also want to have a look at AFS Tool Suite (start with the README for an overview of the tools provided) http://ats.sourceforge.net/ % volspot --help Query the AFS partition layout database for information about where certain types of volumes should be placed. Arguments/Options: --type=

[OpenAFS] RE: OpenAFS-info digest, Vol 1 #2193 - 6 msgs

2005-02-02 Thread Steven Tender
Eh eh ehe nice how can I be a client That's hot Wrong glass sir -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 12:01 PM To: openafs-info@openafs.org Subject: OpenAFS-info digest, Vol 1 #2193 - 6 msgs

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.3.77 under AIX 5.1: unusable

2005-02-02 Thread Hans-Gunther Borrmann
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 16:05, Jim Rees wrote: > You said you're getting core dumps. Can you send us the stack traces? Hello Jim here is another stack trace. It is from the salvager: == bos salvage localhost cp usr.hgb -showlog -local

Re: [OpenAFS] Volume creation tool

2005-02-02 Thread Russ Allbery
A V Le Blanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was searching for something else recently, and happened across a web > page mentioning a tool or utility which creates an AFS volume on one of > several partitions, choosing the one best suited according to some > configurable criteria. Unfortunately I

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.3.77 under AIX 5.1: unusable

2005-02-02 Thread Hans-Gunther Borrmann
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 16:05, Jim Rees wrote: > You said you're getting core dumps. Can you send us the stack traces? This is stack trace from a client crash: =0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:root]# kdb /tmp/vmcore.20 /unix The spec

[OpenAFS] Volume creation tool

2005-02-02 Thread Dr A V Le Blanc
I was searching for something else recently, and happened across a web page mentioning a tool or utility which creates an AFS volume on one of several partitions, choosing the one best suited according to some configurable criteria. Unfortunately I didn't keep the URL, and I can't find the thing d