[OpenAFS] kernel 2.6.10, swsusp2, and afs 1.3.79 incompatible

2005-02-22 Thread dmt marshall
# modprobe libafs FATAL: Error inserting libafs (/lib/modules/2.6.10/kernel/fs/libafs.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) From dmesg: libafs: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel. libafs: Unknown symbol refrigerator ___

[OpenAFS] unofficial 1.3.79 RPMs for Fedora Core 3

2005-02-22 Thread Matthew Miller
As usual, I've updated my unofficial OpenAFS rpms for the new release: Please let me know any improvements you might have -- there's definitely still work to be done here. -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Boston

Re: [OpenAFS] Regulary Ooups'es on 2.4.29 + OpenAFS 1.2.13

2005-02-22 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,David Botsch writes: >[] osi_AllocSmallSpace [libafs-2.4.20-29.8.progeny.9-i586] 0xfd (0xc >6f9fbf0)) >[] osi_UFSOpen [libafs-2.4.20-29.8.progeny.9-i586] 0x49 (0xc6f9fc10) >) >[] osi_InitCacheInfo [libafs-2.4.20-29.8.progeny.9-i586] 0x79 (0xc6f >9fc20)) this has alre

Re: [OpenAFS] Regulary Ooups'es on 2.4.29 + OpenAFS 1.2.13

2005-02-22 Thread David Botsch
Is the 1.3 release considered stable enough for a production client and server? Can the patch be easily backported into 1.2? Thanks! On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:30:31AM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,David Botsch writes: > >[] osi_AllocSmallSpace [libafs

Re: [OpenAFS] Regulary Ooups'es on 2.4.29 + OpenAFS 1.2.13

2005-02-22 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, David Botsch wrote: Is the 1.3 release considered stable enough for a production client and server? That's what we're hoping people will tell us. At this point 1.3.79 is "near 1.4" in terms of having fixes. Can the patch be easily backported into 1.2? Yes. ___

Re: [OpenAFS] Regulary Ooups'es on 2.4.29 + OpenAFS 1.2.13

2005-02-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 11:05:53AM -0500, David Botsch wrote: > Is the 1.3 release considered stable enough for a production client and > server? It's getting much closer, at least. We're using it in production for clients here. -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OpenAFS] Regulary Ooups'es on 2.4.29 + OpenAFS 1.2.13

2005-02-22 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,David Botsch writes: >Is the 1.3 release considered stable enough for a production client and server >? i find it stable enough for client use. ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.or

[OpenAFS] don't clobber logs

2005-02-22 Thread John S. Bucy
Is there any configuration for fileserver/volserver/etc to either keep more old log files, or never rotate logs? john ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

[OpenAFS] provisioning for incrementals

2005-02-22 Thread John S. Bucy
How do people provision backup media for storing incrementals? I'm worried about the possibility of a (l)user overwriting his entire quota regularly which would use a ton of space. Do people have problems with this in practice? john ___ OpenAFS-info

[OpenAFS] linux 2.4: -memcache breaks nvidia driver (?!)

2005-02-22 Thread Ben Staffin
After spending several hours trying to get the nvidia driver to work on a newly installed Debian Sarge system, I've discovered that using -memcache on afsd causes the binary nvidia driver to fail. The nvidia kernel module loads, but the X server absolutely refuses to start. I suppose it might be

Re: [OpenAFS] kaserver sun to linux db auth issue

2005-02-22 Thread John W. Sopko Jr.
We did get one Mac to work, the speacil Mac kinit can auto detect if the tgt is a k4-afs key/salt, we will compare the config with the non working macs The more I researched it there is no way to tell the standard mit "kinit -4", (krb 4 compat mode), to expect afs key/salted tickets. Thanks for re

Re: [OpenAFS] linux 2.4: -memcache breaks nvidia driver (?!)

2005-02-22 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
while i wouldnt call those parameters wrong, i would suggest that they use quite a bit of memory. could you trying using the $SMALL config (with -memcache) and seeing if the nvidia driver works again. In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Ben Staffin writes: >running with "-blocks 65536 -stat 1 -mem

[OpenAFS] RE: NIS on Win 2003 authentication

2005-02-22 Thread ted creedon
There is a free set of unix tools for Windows on the Microsoft web site. It has an windows based NIS server included. (You have to map Linux usernames to AD usernames).. It is true that if the linux boxen pointed to the AD compatible NIS server running Win 2003, the Linux pam based authenticatio

Re: [OpenAFS] Regulary Ooups'es on 2.4.29 + OpenAFS 1.2.13

2005-02-22 Thread Jeffrey Hutzelman
On Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:52:30 AM -0500 chas williams - CONTRACTOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,David Botsch writes: Is the 1.3 release considered stable enough for a production client and server ? i find it stable enough for client use. As do I _

RE: [OpenAFS] don't clobber logs

2005-02-22 Thread Neulinger, Nathan
You could use the -syslog option... Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-6679 UMR Information Technology Fax: (573) 341-4216 > -Origi

[OpenAFS] Using OpenAFS for active replication?

2005-02-22 Thread Mike Fedyk
I was reading the old IBM docs on the openafs web site about replication and they say you should only use the replication on volumes that are infrequently updated, and possibly only managed by administrators since you need to run a "release" operation to update the read-only mirrors. Is there a

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: client hangs with 1.2.13 redhat 9 servers

2005-02-22 Thread Mike Fedyk
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: On Friday, February 04, 2005 01:58:06 PM -0500 Joe Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A further point of information. Using tcpdump on the main two fileservers I see a lot of udp checksum errors. One of the machines has fragment reassembly timeouts, which probably expla

[OpenAFS] Solaris 9 installation instructions

2005-02-22 Thread Christopher D. Clausen
Everytime I install OpenAFS on Solaris 9 I wonder exactly what changes I need to do in the /sbin/mountall file, as the Solaris 9 file does not match the contents listed in the docs on the openafs website at: http://www.openafs.org/pages/doc/QuickStartUnix/auqbg005.htm#HDRWQ47 I came across this