Hello,
First a big thx to everyone for the help on getting the second server up and
running. But now I am having trouble creating a new volume.
I am logged in on the server as root and on openafs as admin so i have all the
rights needed to create a new volume.
The ntpd daemon is also running so
Has anyone has any experience with using drbd with openafs as a failover
HA solution?
Yes, I do. It works.
Do you have documentation of the setup? How do you deal with the old
callbacks and etc?
No old callbacks handling. My afs server failover is equivalent to
server
I asked about the failure of 'unpagsh' under kernels 2.6.x, and
Jeffrey Hutzelman replied:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:01:35AM -0500, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
That's not surprising. unpagsh is not my code, but I did take a quick look
at it when you posted your first message. It works by
Do you have both servers in the CellServDB file on both machines?
On a client, what's the result of udebug -servername -p 7003 for
both servers? Does one show up as sync site?
e.
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 08:43:02 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
First a big thx to
Yes both my servers are in the CellServDB file in /usr/afs/etc/
If I do the udebug command from a client it says:
Host's addresses are: 10.1.202.139
Host's 10.1.202.139 time is Wed Mar 9 14:22:42 2005
Local time is Wed Mar 9 14:22:42 2005 (time differential 0 secs)
Last yes vote for 10.1.202.20
--On Tuesday, March 08, 2005 06:37:42 PM -0500 Matthew Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 08:51:55PM -0500, Jason McCormick wrote:
At a theoretical level, I think my system would work fine. Basically the
system I'm working on has 2 SPEC files. One builds all of the
On Wednesday, March 09, 2005 11:10:00 + Dr A V Le Blanc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked about the failure of 'unpagsh' under kernels 2.6.x, and
Jeffrey Hutzelman replied:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:01:35AM -0500, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
That's not surprising. unpagsh is not my code, but I
Hello
I tried to move several volumes from a TRANSARC fileserver to an OpenAFS
fileserver and got the following error message for two volumes (shown only
for one):
Starting transaction on source volume 537085440 ... done
Cloning source volume 537085440 ... done
Ending the transaction on the
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Hans-Gunther Borrmann wrote:
On the destination the VolserLog contains:
Wed Mar 9 16:52:11 2005 VAttachVolume: Failed to open /vicepcp/V0537085440.vl
(errno 2)
Wed Mar 9 16:52:11 2005 1 Volser: CreateVolume: volume 537085440 (usr.md0)
created
unable to allocate inode: File
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is kind of what I was thinking of too. And hey, why not make that
wrapper script be the main RPM specfile itself? (With an option for just
building the kernel modules, of course.)
Putting it all into the RPM defeats the objective of what I'm
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:28:34 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes both my servers are in the CellServDB file in /usr/afs/etc/
If I do the udebug command from a client it says:
Host's addresses are: 10.1.202.139
Host's 10.1.202.139 time is Wed Mar 9 14:22:42 2005
Local time
Hello and sorry for the OT ,
We are running a Heimdal KDC which is also an OpenAFS 1.2 server.
We have been using it for sometime with windows and gentoo linux clients.
Recently we installed Scientific Linux 3.0.4, a RHEL compatible OS. Using
authconfig we configured it to use ldap for
And I bet if you do the udebug command on the other server it also
says it's not sync site.
It's true, is the problem then in the synchronization between the two
servers?
Sync host 0.0.0.0? Ohh, that's special. I've never seen that before.
What does it mean?
I think your servers
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Danny wrote:
And I bet if you do the udebug command on the other server it also
says it's not sync site.
It's true, is the problem then in the synchronization between the two
servers?
Sync host 0.0.0.0? Ohh, that's special. I've never seen that before.
What does it mean?
I
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:08:00 +0100, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I bet if you do the udebug command on the other server it also
says it's not sync site.
It's true, is the problem then in the synchronization between the two
servers?
Yes. To have quorum, one machine must be sync
Esther Filderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:08:00 +0100, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sync host 0.0.0.0? Ohh, that's special. I've never seen that before.
What does it mean?
I believe it means that it thinks the sync site should be host
0.0.0.0. Which of course
Just an FYI, everything works with memcache. So, is there some known
junkage with a ufs-cache (non-logging) under Solaris10 now?
-rob
Robert Banz wrote:
Hi,
Been doing some testing/building under Solaris 10 x86, and have come up
with this error while trying to do writes:
x
On Mar 9, 2005, at 5:16 PM, Hans-Gunther Borrmann wrote:
Hello
I tried to move several volumes from a TRANSARC fileserver to an
OpenAFS
fileserver and got the following error message for two volumes (shown
only
for one):
Starting transaction on source volume 537085440 ... done
Cloning source
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Robert Banz writes:
Just an FYI, everything works with memcache. So, is there some known
junkage with a ufs-cache (non-logging) under Solaris10 now?
are you sure the filesystem was non-logging? unless you explicitly
mount a filesystem non-logging (nologging), its
Hi,
I installed OpenAFS 1.3.77 on a Windows 2003 Terminal Server (yes I used
add/remove programs), and every time I log in to the server, I get this
warning. Any idea what it means or how to fix it? Thanks!
Event Type:Warning
Event Source:AFS Client
Event Category:None
Event ID:
Robbie Foust wrote:
Hi,
I installed OpenAFS 1.3.77 on a Windows 2003 Terminal Server (yes I used
add/remove programs), and every time I log in to the server, I get this
warning. Any idea what it means or how to fix it? Thanks!
Pkt straddled session startup, took 0 ms, ncb
The Windows SMB
21 matches
Mail list logo
