David Bear wrote:
>On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:50:01PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
>
>>It is not safe to store any files in AFS which are databases that
>>are accessed via multiple applications at the same time. This is
>>because there is no byte range locking supported in AFS.
>>
>>
>
>I
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:50:01PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> It is not safe to store any files in AFS which are databases that
> are accessed via multiple applications at the same time. This is
> because there is no byte range locking supported in AFS.
I understand that would mean ms access
It is not safe to store any files in AFS which are databases that
are accessed via multiple applications at the same time. This is
because there is no byte range locking supported in AFS.
The problem that was solved in AFS with regards to Office applications
is that the overlapped I/O problems wh
A few years ago I attempted to store ms outlook pst files in afs. this
was a big failure. That was when we wer using transarc afs (i think)
I had gleaned from this list that there were no longer issues with
storing outlook.pst files in afs. So I began storing file their a
couple weeks ago. My pst
Stephen Joyce wrote:
I didn't see any method of PAG implementation in the source either, but I'm
just beginning to read up on DAV, so perhaps it has some other way of
dealing with that particular problem (or I'm thinking of a problem that
wouldn't really exist).
IIRC, Apache-AuthKrb5Afs calls
Joshua,
I took a brief look at the source for Apache-AuthKrb5Afs on CPAN and it
looks very simple; much too simple to be aware of AFS-specific features
such as ACLs, groups, etc.
I didn't see any method of PAG implementation in the source either, but I'm
just beginning to read up on DAV, so perha
