Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looking at my copy of rxstat_clear_peer.c from rc5 I see no reference to
spvrPort at line 60.
*srvrPort = strtol(*(argp++), NULL, 0);
if (*srvrPort = 0 || *srvrPort = 65536)
Usage();
Please check to see that this is not local
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:04:23PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
`/home/mattdm/rpmbuild/BUILD/openafs-1.4.0-rc5/src/libadmin/samples'
Hmm... I guess this means I should stop building RPMS, huh? ;)
:) Well, mine take a somewhat different approach to packaging than yours do.
--
Matthew Miller
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Derek Atkins wrote:
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looking at my copy of rxstat_clear_peer.c from rc5 I see no reference to
spvrPort at line 60.
*srvrPort = strtol(*(argp++), NULL, 0);
if (*srvrPort = 0 || *srvrPort = 65536)
Usage();
Please
The rose-hulman.edu AFS domain uses AFS 1.3 or newer meaning
Kerberos 5 or newer for authentication. The cs.rose-hulman.edu AFS domain
uses AFS 1.2 authenticating agains Kerberos 4 still until it can be
upgraded. Is there a way to contact both servers? At a
minimum, I think Leash should
Gurganus, Brant L wrote:
The rose-hulman.edu AFS domain uses AFS 1.3 or newer meaning Kerberos 5
or newer for authentication. The cs.rose-hulman.edu AFS domain uses AFS
1.2 authenticating agains Kerberos 4 still until it can be upgraded. Is
there a way to contact both servers? At a minimum,
Thank you for the information. You were correct about those version
numbers. I was thinking they were in sync with the clients. Anyhow, I
seem to have been able to authenticate the cs.rose-hulman.edu domain
with klog and was able to modify files that the ACLs indicate I should
not be able to
On Wednesday, September 28, 2005 10:17:40 AM -0400 Derrick J Brashear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Derek Atkins wrote:
Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looking at my copy of rxstat_clear_peer.c from rc5 I see no reference to
spvrPort at line 60.
*srvrPort =
Hi,
I'm new to AFS and I'm trying to allow access to a server through
NAT. I have two servers running 1.4.0rc3 on Solaris 10 with kerberos5
(SEAM). One server has the main RW/RO volumes and the other just has
RO volumes. I have windows and macosx clients running fine against it
from behind the
Over the past week, I've had reports of clients not being able to
connect to AFS home directories with connection timeout messages. By
the time I get the call, the gremlin is gone and all is well. I can't
tell if it's a problem with AFS, or network. In each case the client
has been on Sun or
Today we had a weird failure that ended up affecting many of our campus
services.
A fileserver that holds nothing but user volumes became unresponsive.
This fileserver is physically in another building / different subnet.
Our web servers that mount /afs/msu/web-volumes went south. A ls of
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:11:25 -0400
Steve Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I query the local cache and find out where the client thinks
root.cell .readonly is? My theory is the clients (mostly Solaris )
Yes. `fs whereis /afs/cell.name' on the client will tell you which
server it thinks it
11 matches
Mail list logo
