Re: [OpenAFS] Changing reserved block on ext3 with fs running

2005-10-06 Thread Stephan Wonczak
Hi! On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Tim Spriggs wrote: Isn't there something about needing a small percentage of space to be able to keep the ext3/ext2 filesystem from fragmenting too much? Does this apply here? Not that I know of. Even so, 25 GB on a 500 GB filesystem is a bit excessive, wouldn't

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0rc5 SRPMS with amd64 problems...

2005-10-06 Thread Derek Atkins
Thanks.. I don't know exactly why it was stripping off that extra bit originally. I'll make this change for the next release. Either rc7 or 1.4.0-final. Thank you for testing the RPMS. Any other issues you've found with them? -derek Matthew N. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I modded

Re: [OpenAFS] Changing reserved block on ext3 with fs running

2005-10-06 Thread Robert Banz
Tim Spriggs wrote: Isn't there something about needing a small percentage of space to be able to keep the ext3/ext2 filesystem from fragmenting too much? Does this apply here? Also, is there a problem with running on ext3? I only ask because I know openafs can not use journaling filesystems

[OpenAFS] 1.4.0 rc6 Solaris 10 x86-64 issues?

2005-10-06 Thread Kris Kasner
Hi. I'm working on getting Solaris 10 x86-64 ready to deploy in our environment. I'm having trouble getting OpenAFS to work correctly when Solaris is booted under the 64bit kernel (the default for the opteron boxes we're planning on using). It works perfectly when booted under the 32bit

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 rc6 Solaris 10 x86-64 issues?

2005-10-06 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Kris Kasner wrote: Hi. I'm working on getting Solaris 10 x86-64 ready to deploy in our environment. I'm having trouble getting OpenAFS to work correctly when Solaris is booted under the 64bit kernel (the default for the opteron boxes we're planning on using). It works