[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS working on OpenSSI

2005-10-31 Thread Ron Croonenberg
Hello all, I finally have OpenAFS working on OpenSSI. There were a few changes that were needed in OpenSSI and that are in the OpenSSI (http://www.openssi.org) CVS for accomodating OpenAFS. In OpenAFS there are a few (very few) changes that are needed to make it compile and work on OpenSSI - a

Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL4 x86_64 1.4.0-rc5 RPM install aklog segfault

2005-10-31 Thread Derek Atkins
What does "uname -r" return? Running the rpmbuild on an x86_64 should build the userspace RPMS and a kernel module/rpm for the currently running kernel. If it's an SMP kernel, then it should be an SMP module. -derek Quoting Lee Damon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This was all compiled in one rpmbuild

Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL4 x86_64 1.4.0-rc5 RPM install aklog segfault

2005-10-31 Thread Lee Damon
This was all compiled in one rpmbuild -ba operation so hopefully it was all done with the same compiler. Turns out the rpmbuild didn't build modules for SMP kernel (even when compiled while a 2.6.9-22.ELsmp kernel was running) so I'm back to playing with colorful blocks for a while until I lea

Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL4 x86_64 1.4.0-rc5 RPM install aklog segfault

2005-10-31 Thread lamont
I had problems like this when I compiled aklog with a different compiler (gcc-2.95.3) from the one that I used with openafs (gcc-3.2.3) awhile back. Hopefully with them integrated together there's no way for it to pick up different compilers, but you never know... On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Lee D

Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL4 x86_64 1.4.0-rc5 RPM install aklog segfault

2005-10-31 Thread Lee Damon
attached... I hope. :) nomad Jeffrey Altman wrote: Can you provide a back trace from the core file? Jeffrey Altman Script started on Mon 31 Oct 2005 02:30:23 PM PST : || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [1] ; gdb /usr/bin/aklog core.22340 GNU gdb 6.3 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is fr

[OpenAFS] Re: Transitioning from IBM Transarc to OpenAFS Help

2005-10-31 Thread John Harris
Hey all, Thanks so much for the quick response. Seems like it's overwhelmingly easy to move and there's no interoperability issues; that makes the decision much easier than the pessimistic nightmare scenario which I normally envision as being the default :) John

Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL4 x86_64 1.4.0-rc5 RPM install aklog segfault

2005-10-31 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Can you provide a back trace from the core file? Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[OpenAFS] RHEL4 x86_64 1.4.0-rc5 RPM install aklog segfault

2005-10-31 Thread Lee Damon
Derek, In the now successfully rebuilt 1.4.0rc5 SRPM-based RPM for x86_64 everything seems to work except for aklog. It segfaults. : || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [15] ; which aklog /usr/bin/aklog : || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [16] ; rpm -qf /usr/bin/aklog openafs-krb5-1.4.0rc5-1.1 : || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~

Re: [OpenAFS] Transitioning from IBM Transarc to OpenAFS Help

2005-10-31 Thread Ken Hornstein
>Here, we are debating about a couple of ways to transition: >[...] >I'd really like some feedback, either in the appropriate forum or >personally, on experiences or thoughts. There isn't a lot publicly out >there on a big transition like this. I think enough people have weighed in on how easy

[OpenAFS] [Fwd: 4NT 7.0 / Take Command 7.0 Public Beta]

2005-10-31 Thread Jeffrey Altman
JPSoftware has begun its public beta for the next release of 4NT and TCMD replacement command shells for Windows 2000, XP and 2003. I am forwarding the announcement to the OpenAFS community because of their incorporation of special features just for OpenAFS users. Some highlights: * 4NT/TCMD ca

Re: [OpenAFS] loging into afs: ssh vs gdm

2005-10-31 Thread Ron Croonenberg
Hi Douglas, no that is an afs account too. >>> "Douglas E. Engert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/31/05 3:00 PM >>> What is: Oct 31 14:07:33 oort kernel: reop_import_path: no such path: /afs/csc.depauw.edu/home/jeepdude So it looks like it is still trying to lookin AFS, even though you said it was a l

Re: [OpenAFS] loging into afs: ssh vs gdm

2005-10-31 Thread Douglas E. Engert
What is: Oct 31 14:07:33 oort kernel: reop_import_path: no such path: /afs/csc.depauw.edu/home/jeepdude So it looks like it is still trying to lookin AFS, even though you said it was a local account. Ron Croonenberg wrote: Hi Douglas, Sounds like gdm and X11 are trying to access your hom

Re: [OpenAFS] Transitioning from IBM Transarc to OpenAFS Help

2005-10-31 Thread Steve Devine
Andrew Bacchi wrote: We migrated from AIX/Transarc to Linux/OpenAFS about 2 years ago. I chose method 1 to make a gradual transition over the course of a summer. For a few weeks I had a mixed cell with both platforms in production. I did not have any problems with database corruption and a

Re: [OpenAFS] loging into afs: ssh vs gdm

2005-10-31 Thread Ron Croonenberg
Hi Douglas, >Sounds like gdm and X11 are trying to access your home directory >before having a token. hmmm.. I see what you mean one thing though on other machines (afs-clients) I don't seem to have that problem. >If your pam_krb5 has a force_cred and/or force_token option, you >may want to us

Re: [OpenAFS] loging into afs: ssh vs gdm

2005-10-31 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Ron Croonenberg wrote: Hi Frank, Just a guess: Maybe you should have a look @ the last lines of ~cowboy/.xession-errors . I once had a problem that looked like yours. I blamed AFS/Kerberos/NSA but is was just a syntax error in /etc/X11/XSession.d/somefile which prevented the session itself f

Re: [OpenAFS] Transitioning from IBM Transarc to OpenAFS Help

2005-10-31 Thread Andrew Bacchi
We migrated from AIX/Transarc to Linux/OpenAFS about 2 years ago. I chose method 1 to make a gradual transition over the course of a summer. For a few weeks I had a mixed cell with both platforms in production. I did not have any problems with database corruption and all DB and file servers

Re: [OpenAFS] loging into afs: ssh vs gdm

2005-10-31 Thread Ron Croonenberg
Hi Frank, >Just a guess: Maybe you should have a look @ the last lines of >~cowboy/.xession-errors . I once had a problem that looked like >yours. I blamed AFS/Kerberos/NSA but is was just a syntax error in >/etc/X11/XSession.d/somefile which prevented the session itself from >starting. hmm.. I

[OpenAFS] pam_afs debug info

2005-10-31 Thread Ron Croonenberg
I have been staring at the debug info from pam_afs for a while. I added it below. I believe that it seems to look ok ? Ron Oct 31 13:13:39 oort gdm(pam_unix)[71278]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=cowboy.cs.depauw.edu:0 ruser= rhost=cowboy.cs.depauw.edu user=cowboy Oct 31 13:

Re: [OpenAFS] Transitioning from IBM Transarc to OpenAFS Help

2005-10-31 Thread John Hascall
> Greetings OpenAFS Community, > > We are *finally* going to transition our production AFS cells from IBM > Transarc to the OpenAFS code base. I have lots of questions ... We chose to do the rolling upgrade. We were pretty much forced to switch all our AFS-DB servers to OpenAFS when the 1.2.1

Re: [OpenAFS] loging into afs: ssh vs gdm

2005-10-31 Thread Frank Burkhardt
Hi, On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:05:34AM -0500, Ron Croonenberg wrote: [snip] > Now .. I cannot login with gdm/xdm, it looks like I get logged in but > the session terminates immediately. > I see the same entry in /var/log/messages as above and this one: > Oct 31 10:56:49 oort gdm(pam_unix)[6777

[OpenAFS] Transitioning from IBM Transarc to OpenAFS Help

2005-10-31 Thread John Harris
Greetings OpenAFS Community, We are *finally* going to transition our production AFS cells from IBM Transarc to the OpenAFS code base. I have lots of questions and discussion points and am not sure if this is the appropriate forum to do it in, so I'd first like pointers on where to place it.

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Maximum disk cache size

2005-10-31 Thread Jeffrey Hutzelman
On Monday, October 31, 2005 09:18:31 AM -0500 Joe Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: there have been some discussions on the openafs-devel list recently about cache tuning. check the archives. the 1.4.x branch also has the "new" default cache tuning (aut

[OpenAFS] loging into afs: ssh vs gdm

2005-10-31 Thread Ron Croonenberg
Hello all, I have afs (the client) working on the OpenSSI cluster. "Everything" seems to work, I can login with ssh and so far everything seems to be working as it should. (However I do see: Oct 31 10:56:49 oort gdm(pam_unix)[67775]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=cowboy.cs.dep

[OpenAFS] pam_krb5 taking too long to authenticate

2005-10-31 Thread Kurt Seiffert
We have been having problems with the pam_krb5 module. It takes a long time 20-30 seconds after entering your password for a prompt to return. We having been able to figure out this problem yet. Here is a sample of output from syslog during a login. Of special interest is the 20 second jump at the

[OpenAFS] Re: /afs permissions

2005-10-31 Thread Joe Buehler
Hendrik Hoeth wrote: >>Is there any real reason for it to be 777 given that it's the AFS >>mount point? Wouldn't 755 be a better mode? > > > [10:38] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ ls -dl /afs > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 9 2004 /afs > [10:38] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ > > Works for me ... ;-) O

[OpenAFS] Re: Maximum disk cache size

2005-10-31 Thread Joe Buehler
chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > there have been some discussions on the openafs-devel list recently about > cache tuning. check the archives. the 1.4.x branch also has the "new" > default cache tuning (auto chunksize selection and different assumption > for average file size). > > if you ga

Re: [OpenAFS] ptserver segfault on amd64

2005-10-31 Thread Andreas Hirczy
Dave Broudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Hirczy wrote: > >>Newer packages are in debian/unstable. I have recompiled 1.4.0rc1 for >>debian/stable - they work very good for me. You can find those packages at >>. > I still h

Re: [OpenAFS] ptserver segfault on amd64

2005-10-31 Thread Lars Schimmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Broudy wrote: > > Andreas Hirczy wrote: > >> Newer packages are in debian/unstable. I have recompiled 1.4.0rc1 for >> debian/stable - they work very good for me. You can find those >> packages at >>