Re: [OpenAFS] files missing from incremental vos restore

On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Christoph Scheurer wrote: Yes, the incremental dumps were restored with that option. And the list of files that are missing is quite strange. Some of them have been recently (i.e. after the last full dump) modified, others have not been modified in a long time. There is no cl

[OpenAFS] Multiple Cells

Hi All Great about the new release. Looks cool and works, just a few questions. 1. OpenAFS 1.4 should be capable of using MIT Kerberos V, When creating the the keytab (for use with asetkey) I do "ktadd -e des-cbc-crc:v4 afs/linet.dk", when using aklog it fails if krb524d is not running. Is th

Re: [OpenAFS] Multiple Cells

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mikkel Kruse Johnsen wrote: > Hi All > > Great about the new release. Looks cool and works, just a few questions. > > 1. OpenAFS 1.4 should be capable of using MIT Kerberos V, When creating > the the keytab (for use with asetkey) I do "ktadd -e des-c

Re: [OpenAFS] Multiple Cells

>1. OpenAFS 1.4 should be capable of using MIT Kerberos V, When creating >the the keytab (for use with asetkey) I do "ktadd -e des-cbc-crc:v4 >afs/linet.dk", when using aklog it fails if krb524d is not running. Is >that the way to create the keytab ? Should'nt I be able to use aklog >without krb524

[OpenAFS] Upgrading/Migrating to new OpenAFS and host OS versions

I have a server running OpenAFS 1.2.13 on Red Hat Enterprise 3, using Kerberos 5 for athentication (the AFS server is not one of the KDCs). I want to upgrade to OpenAFS 1.4.0 and RH Enterprise 4. It seems to me that the sanest approach may well be to do a fresh install of the OS (on another p

[OpenAFS] 1.4.0 Solaris 10 sparc client hang

The AFS client has hung on one of my AFS servers (E3000 running Solaris 10.) It has the 1.4.0 binaries from the openafs.orgr website installed. The client hung on a cp operation from afs to the local disk. rxdebug returns: C:\>rxdebug afs2 7001 Trying 128.174.251.9 (port 7001): Free packets: 1

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 Solaris 10 sparc client hang

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christopher D. Clausen wrote: The AFS client has hung on one of my AFS servers (E3000 running Solaris 10.) It has the 1.4.0 binaries from the openafs.orgr website installed. The client hung on a cp operation from afs to the local disk. cmdebug afs2 and see what it tells yo

[OpenAFS] 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86/amd64

Hi Folks Is anyone successfully using 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86 amd64 with Solaris booted 64bit (the default)? I tried multiple compiles of rc4-8, both with the latest GCC and with SunStudio10 (fully patched), and once the full release came out, I tried the binary release available at OpenAFS.

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 Solaris 10 sparc client hang

On 07Nov2005 10:45a Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christopher D. Clausen wrote: The AFS client has hung on one of my AFS servers (E3000 running Solaris 10.) It has the 1.4.0 binaries from the openafs.orgr website installed. The client hung on a cp operation

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 Solaris 10 sparc client hang

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christopher D. Clausen wrote: On 07Nov2005 10:45a Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christopher D. Clausen wrote: The AFS client has hung on one of my AFS servers (E3000 running Solaris 10.) It has the 1.4.0 binaries from the openafs.orgr w

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 Solaris 10 sparc client hang

Derrick J Brashear wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christopher D. Clausen wrote: > >> cmdebug appears to hang forever, unless it takes a LONG time to >> generate output... (and it doesn't on my other servers.) >> >> I assume this is not a good sign? > > > Well, it will make it rather hard to figure

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86/amd64

According to Kris Kasner: > > Is anyone successfully using 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86 amd64 with Solaris > booted 64bit (the default)? > > I tried multiple compiles of rc4-8, both with the latest GCC and with > SunStudio10 (fully patched), and once the full release came out, I tried > the binary relea

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 Solaris 10 sparc client hang

Jeffrey Altman wrote: >Derrick J Brashear wrote: > > >>On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Christopher D. Clausen wrote: >> >> >> >>>cmdebug appears to hang forever, unless it takes a LONG time to >>>generate output... (and it doesn't on my other servers.) >>> >>>I assume this is not a good sign? >>>

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 Solaris 10 sparc client hang

Tim Spriggs wrote: >I see similar lockups on Solaris 11 x86. After kinit, aklog never returns: > ># ./bin/cmdebug afsone -long >cmdebug: error checking locks: server or network not responding >cmdebug: failed to get cache entry 0 (server or network not responding) ># uname -a >SunOS salenor 5.11 s

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86/amd64

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Loic Tortay wrote: I have the same problem. I submitted a bug report for this about 3 weeks ago but the ticket was silently closed (). You have a strange definition of silence. However, the referred-to issue is then not the sam

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86/amd64

I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but all I can find from the link you provided is the initial bug report.. The patch you're referring to is in 1.4.0, and it deals with user level commands "svcs -p" and "ctrun -v" causing a system panic because of an orphaned kernel thread.. The patch cau

[OpenAFS] rpm conflict

So this is kinda problematic, I don't want to change the underlying OS by removing a package and force installing this seems a bit wrong. What is other people doing about this? Do they not care? Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin/pagsh from install of openafs-1.4.0-rhel4.1 conflicts wit

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86/amd64

According to Derrick J Brashear: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Loic Tortay wrote: > > >I have the same problem. > > > >I submitted a bug report for this about 3 weeks ago but the ticket was > >silently closed (). > > You have a strange definition of silence. How

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86/amd64

According to Kris Kasner: [...] > > I hope that helps clarify things.. If I'm missing where the resolution is > shown on the URL you sent, please let me know.. I'd love to try it out if > there is a different patch to address this. > Indeed, the "svcs -p" problem was ticket #22317 while the problem

Re: [OpenAFS] rpm conflict

I've not seen this on any of my test machines.. But.. perhaps you shouldn't have the 'krbafs' package installed? -derek Quoting "Derek T. Yarnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: So this is kinda problematic, I don't want to change the underlying OS by removing a package and force installing this seems

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86/amd64

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Loic Tortay wrote: According to Derrick J Brashear: On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Loic Tortay wrote: I have the same problem. I submitted a bug report for this about 3 weeks ago but the ticket was silently closed (). You have a strange

[OpenAFS] client speed in Multi-homed server environment

Is there a way to make an afs client not to try to connect to a server on a multi-homed interface that is not routable from the clients current ip? I have a situation where my client does get access to everything in the CELL but the initial connect test some time while it tries to connect

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 on Solaris 10 x86/amd64

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Loic Tortay writes: >I know of at least one site which is using OpenAFS in 64 bit mode on >AMD64, I have tested the binaries of their known working release >(1.3.76) and they do not work in 64 bit mode on a 118844-08 Solaris 10 >kernel (they do probably not work on ne

Re: [OpenAFS] 1.4.0 Solaris 10 sparc client hang

Jeffrey Altman wrote: >Tim Spriggs wrote: > > > >>I see similar lockups on Solaris 11 x86. After kinit, aklog never returns: >> >># ./bin/cmdebug afsone -long >>cmdebug: error checking locks: server or network not responding >>cmdebug: failed to get cache entry 0 (server or network not respondin

[OpenAFS] Has anyone backported 1.4 release to debian sarge

Hi Before I try and build my own, just thought I would ask if anyone has a backport of openafs 1.4 release version for Debian Sarge. We would like to start testing so I can get it into production for 2006. Cheers matt ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list

Re: [OpenAFS] Has anyone backported 1.4 release to debian sarge

Matthew Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Before I try and build my own, just thought I would ask if anyone has a > backport of openafs 1.4 release version for Debian Sarge. We would like > to start testing so I can get it into production for 2006. This should be as simple as just building the

Re: [OpenAFS] Has anyone backported 1.4 release to debian sarge

I have just down loaded from sid this morning and has got 1.4rc4. It compiled fine on sarge so i guess your new upload will filter through the system soon and I can just use that. Thanks Matt Russ Allbery wrote: Matthew Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Before I try and build my ow

Re: [OpenAFS] Has anyone backported 1.4 release to debian sarge

Matthew Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have just down loaded from sid this morning and has got 1.4rc4. It > compiled fine on sarge so i guess your new upload will filter through > the system soon and I can just use that. Yeah, by just uploaded, I mean I got the notification from katie ear