shajid (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
hi,
I have installed afs on linux FC 4.
But I am facing a problem.
The problem is that I am not able to see the symbolic links that are
present in the /afs directory.
Is there something that I am missing in the configurations??
I
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:01:41AM -0500, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
[snip]
The 1.4 series supports the ability to write debug and audit logs
from the various servers to named pipes instead of files. You can
implement filtering by deploying a process that reads from a named
pipe and
I am looking at needing to setup a large storage array 2TB and mirror it to a remote location and accessed by 8+ machines. We are looking at using a SAN for the storage scalability reasons and am trying to figure out file systems and replication. GFS is designed to be run on shared storage and
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:38:31AM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
- AFS storage is organized into volumes, attached to one or more mount
points under the /afs tree. These volumes can be moved from server
to server while they are in use. This is great when you have to
take down a machine, or you
Dan Pritts wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:38:31AM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
- AFS storage is organized into volumes, attached to one or more mount
points under the /afs tree. These volumes can be moved from server
to server while they are in use. This is great when you have to
take down a
I mean, it seems to me to be such an obvious thing to do that I don't even
know why it would surprise you.
What he said.
--Ken
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
This can also be considered a disadvantage. When using AFS, you are
forced to manage your storage the AFS way. Files are
effectively not
stored natively on the filesystem, and cannot be accessed
via some other
method, and must be backed up via afs-specific methods.
It works
Forgive me asking this question here, though it is related to
OpenAFS only indirectly.
For a long time we were using patched openssh to transfer AFS
authentication between machines. This involved using a local
patch, which we maintained up to 3.7.1, and transferred AFS
tokens using ssh protocol
Am Mittwoch, 23. November 2005 16:09 schrieb ext Dr A V Le Blanc:
(1) It won't allow a user whose home directory is in AFS to
authenticate using ssh keys, even if he has Kerberos
tickets to transfer.
Should work if the ssh key is stored in LDAP.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk
This can also be considered a disadvantage. When
using AFS, you are
forced to manage your storage the AFS way. Files are effectively
not
stored natively on the filesystem, and cannot be accessed via some
other
method, and must be backed up via afs-specific methods.
Namei does stores files
(1) It won't allow a user whose home directory is in AFS to
authenticate using ssh keys, even if he has Kerberos
tickets to transfer.
You can fix this by setting StrictModes no in your sshd_config.
What bothers me is that you can't delegate credentials unless you have used
those
* Dr A V Le Blanc [2005-11-23 15:09:33 +]:
The GSSAPI support in the recently released openssh 4.2 appears
mostly to do what we need: with proper configuration, an ordinary
user can pass Kerberos tickets to a remote machine, where a PAM
module gets tokens using aklog. So far as I can see,
Neulinger, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something as simple as having an alternative namei that would look the
same down below, but would have the top level directory be the RW volume
id corresponding to whatever data is being stored.
Um, the top-level directory (well, two top-level dirs)
Oh... Very cool. Did not realize that at all...
-- Nathan
Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-6679
UMR Information Technology Fax: (573)
A V Le Blanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When we upgraded from using the kaserver to using Heimdal, we
could use the Kerberos support patched into openssh 3.8.1
in the Debian ssh-krb5 package. This package is rather buggy
and not actively maintained, but it seemed an adequate interim
measure
Jim Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What bothers me is that you can't delegate credentials unless you have
used those credentials for login.
The OpenSSH folks consider this to be a security requirement, although I
don't really understand why.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Im using afs-sysname amd64_fbsd53 but im running FreeBSD-6.0-RELEASE.
Will it work?
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Im using afs-sysname amd64_fbsd53 but im running FreeBSD-6.0-RELEASE.
Will it work?
I don't think so, but you are welcome to try. I suggest you write a param
file for amd64_fbsd60 and use that instead. Let me know if it works.
___
OpenAFS-info
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:57:49 -0500, Jim Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Im using afs-sysname amd64_fbsd53 but im running FreeBSD-6.0-RELEASE.
Will it work?
I don't think so, but you are welcome to try. I suggest you write a
param
file for amd64_fbsd60 and use that instead. Let me know
At the very least you should change the SYS_NAME and add AFS_FBSD60_ENV to
src/config/param.amd64_fbsd_53.h.
And I would suggest adding the configure flags from the README.
Why did you add -fPIC to the CFLAGS?
I doubt very much that any linux binaries will work, because the afs
syscalls are not
Thank you all for your suggestions.
After fiddling around with it a little bit and checking for all the
suggested fixes, I realize that my problem is more of my Apache 2.0
installation problem than AFS authentication at this point. I do have
the FollowSymLinks option set on my configuration,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, zeroguy wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:56:27 -0500
Jim Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those of you who are running apache authenticated to afs, I'm just
curious... why?
And the permission model in AFS gets around that annoying problem of
needing the web server to
Tim Spriggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, this doesn't completely solve the problem, right? As long as
the webserver can see it and other people can run stuff as the webserver
(like a quick perl/cgi script)
Right, that's why you don't allow the second one, or if you do, you run
those
Hello all,
I've got a Development and a production cell and I'm having issues
with how I've configured it. (I'm sure I've missed something)
here is how they are both setup.
each network has 3 subnets
external (live on internet)
internal (a private ip range)
management (another private ip
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Dan Pritts wrote:
This can also be considered a disadvantage. When using AFS, you are
forced to manage your storage the AFS way. Files are effectively not
stored natively on the filesystem, and cannot be accessed via some other
method, and must be backed up via
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Horst Birthelmer wrote:
On Nov 22, 2005, at 8:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know why the AFS community continues to support this convention
which breaks location independence. *shrug*.
Okay, support was a bad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider if you have:
/afs/newyork.cell/home/horst
And then you get sent to the bangalore office for an extended period of
time and now your home cell is /afs/bangalore.cell. There are ways to
deal with this, but if you go down this path long enough to its
--On Wednesday, November 23, 2005 05:04:35 PM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
but if you go down this path long enough to its logical end you wind up
not liking the /afs/cell convention very much...
What are the alternatives? Who gets to decide what content gets what
globally unique path?
28 matches
Mail list logo
