Side note: Jeff H's description of my situation is exactly correct,
down to the last detail.
Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam is the administrator of his cell and until he can convince the
> powers that be at Berkeley to distribute configuration data for him
This is the strang
Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I have said is that before I as a gatekeeper would accept code
> that makes fundamental changes to the way authentication and
> authorization works,
It's cool, I understand this even if I don't agree with it.
I (grudgingly) revived this point pri
Ron Croonenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
I'm not sure what you mean.. The RPM doesn't care about the RUNNING
kernel.. It /does/ care about having 'kernel = " where
is the kernel version the RPM was built against.
> Is there a way around it ?
Um, maybe you could just build the kerne
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> The problem, Jeff, is that you have not quite gotten over the antiquated
> notion of a "site" in which a central administrator exerts complete
> control over all the services and all the clients.
Jeff:
I don't believe that any service provider has complete control over
On Sunday, January 29, 2006 06:13:29 PM -0800 Jeffrey Altman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam Megacz wrote:
I argue that, in the post-Transarc era, there are a large number of
situations where OpenAFS is useful for which no coherent/meaningful
definition of "site" exists ("cell", of course,
Adam Megacz wrote:
> I would actually love to contribute as such a volunteer (as I have
> done for gcc and other projects), but my desire to do so has been
> totally nuked by the sorts of assumptions ingrained in those who
> decide which contributions get accepted and which don't. The gcc
> proje
Adam Megacz wrote:
> I argue that, in the post-Transarc era, there are a large number of
> situations where OpenAFS is useful for which no coherent/meaningful
> definition of "site" exists ("cell", of course, is still well-defined).
For 99% of users, they install OpenAFS to access the data in one
Adam Megacz wrote:
> Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Nor is it what we want you to do.
>
> If bandwidth is a concern I can certainly arrange to host a mirror of
> the openafs downloads. We have plenty of bandwidth here.
>
> - a
Its not a question of bandwidth. I'm sure that MIT
(sorry if this appears twice)
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Er, no. AFS was originally developed to serve the needs of Carnegie
> Mellon University, which still has multiple cells. IBM helped fund
> its development (much as DEC and others helped fund MIT's Project
> A
(sorry if this appears twice)
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Er, no. AFS was originally developed to serve the needs of Carnegie
> Mellon University, which still has multiple cells. IBM helped fund
> its development (much as DEC and others helped fund MIT's Project
> A
On Jan 29, 2006, at 6:19 , Adam Megacz wrote:
I think the confusion comes from the fact that AFS was originally a
commercial software program that you had to pay a huge amount of money
for. Therefore, every user had exactly one "site" -- the organization
that paid for his/her copy. It was ext
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Adam Megacz wrote:
Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nor is it what we want you to do.
If bandwidth is a concern I can certainly arrange to host a mirror of
the openafs downloads. We have plenty of bandwidth here.
You have failed to understand. He's saying si
[ As a side note, I finally got this whole thing working by creating the ]
[ bogus AFSDB entry mentioned earlier. But I'd like to continue this ]
[ discussion because I think the use case I've set up is a very valuable ]
[ one. I'm currently working on a detailed guide on how to set up
Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nor is it what we want you to do.
If bandwidth is a concern I can certainly arrange to host a mirror of
the openafs downloads. We have plenty of bandwidth here.
- a
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-
Adam Megacz wrote:
> To clarify, I need to point them at an installer on openafs.org that
> they can double click (with a strong preference for being able to
> accept all the default options). This is for Windows and MacOS users;
> the Linux users know what they're doing (I hope).
Considering th
Ryan Propper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I forgot to mention one intermediate step I had to perform, though I
> don't know if it makes a difference. (Apologies, but it slipped my mind!)
> During "sudo module-assistant auto-build openafs-modules" the setup
> failed about halfway through. I ch
* Ron Croonenberg [2006-01-28 12:46:17 -0500]:
> I pxe booted the machines, used kickstart with the nfs way of installing
> things including the OpenAFS
> rpm's for the client install.
>
> However, the newer versions of the OpenAFS rpms check to see what kernel they
> are running on and if it
>
I forgot to mention one intermediate step I had to perform, though I
don't know if it makes a difference. (Apologies, but it slipped my
mind!)
During "sudo module-assistant auto-build openafs-modules" the
setup failed about halfway through. I checked the error log and
found that the install scr
18 matches
Mail list logo
