Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Comment out the CheckForNetwork bit and it will start every time, but
> if you do, make sure you have -dynroot as an afsd option.
Thanks, Derrick!
Unless I'm mistaken, this generalized behavior (use dynroot, always
start AFS at boot even if no net
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Adam Megacz wrote:
I'm getting this strange behavior with rc6 on Mac OS X... after I
install and reboot, the client works perfectly. On subsequent reboots
(ie after the first one after the install) the service doesn't start,
but if I start it manually (/Library/StartupItems
-- Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on 5.
Februar 2006 15:31:29 -0800 regarding [OpenAFS] strange behavior on -rc6 /
MacOS: works on first boot, not thereafter:
Related question: is there a reason why OpenAFS installs into
/Library/StartupItems instead of /System/Libr
There should never be any reason to build with --disable-afsdb. If you
don't want afsdb, don't turn it on. Even if you do turn it on, I think the
CellServDB still takes precedence.
If you can't build without --disable-afsdb because of build problems, I
think we'd like to hear about that.
___
I'm getting this strange behavior with rc6 on Mac OS X... after I
install and reboot, the client works perfectly. On subsequent reboots
(ie after the first one after the install) the service doesn't start,
but if I start it manually (/Library/StartupItems/OpenAFS), it works
fine.
Related questio
Please install rc6 so you obtain some additional debugging
info and run the file log level at 125. rc2 doesn't have
the patch to distinguish client's host structures by port
number.
Jeffrey Altman
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
> As per my first post on this topic, fileservers are:
> C:\>for /l
As per my first post on this topic, fileservers are:
C:\>for /l %i in (1,1,4) do @rxdebug afs%i -version
Trying 128.174.251.8 (port 7000):
AFS version: OpenAFS 1.4.1-rc2 built 2005-12-12
Trying 128.174.251.9 (port 7000):
AFS version: OpenAFS 1.4.1-rc5 built 2006-01-27
Trying 128.174.251.10 (po
The "FindClient X had Y, stolen by X" messages simply mean that the
client X initiated two calls to the file server and the second call
blocked while the first was associating the incoming connection with
the host entry.
The WhoAreYou failed error indicates that there is a host entry on the
file s
No. There is a static reservation of 128.174.251.61 where my laptop has
been all weekend.
<
Did you receive a new IP address not previously used after removing
the alternate configuration?
Jeffrey Altman
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
I should have been more specific. Yes, I understand that
Did you receive a new IP address not previously used after removing the
alternate configuration?
Jeffrey Altman
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
> I should have been more specific. Yes, I understand that these messages
> show up when a machine changes IP addresses. However, would the
> messages co
I should have been more specific. Yes, I understand that these messages
show up when a machine changes IP addresses. However, would the
messages continue to show up even if there has not been a machine at the
old IP address for over 48 hours?
Sun Feb 5 15:46:38 2006 CB: WhoAreYou failed for 1
The messages you are seeing are normal behavior. The client is moving
to a new IP address/port combination and the file server can't find the
client at the old address. Reinstalling the client or switching to
DHCP will not alter the behavior.
Jeffrey Altman
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
> I hav
I have Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition with SP1 installed on my laptop
(don't ask, but yes I really do need the enterprise edition of Windows
Server.) I am using the "Alternate Configuration" to specify a static
IP address for when I am at work and there is no DHCP as per:
http://www.microsoft
Jim,
The compile fails were due to the Makefiles being unaware of the rlim defines in the kernel code. There has been some traffic as to who's to blame, the configure scripts or the compiler. The patch hard codes the existance of rlim. The install failures were primarly due to no-one yet giving
Hi,
I trying to set up AFS on Linux Slackware, with kernel 2.6.15.1. I
installed OpenAFS-1.4.1-rc5. When reading Quick Beginnings - Getting
Started on Linux Systems, it tells me to copy files from a CDROM but
since I downloaded OpenAFS, I don't have a CDROM. Also, it tells me to
copy afs.rc t
Why --disable-afsdb?
Can you look in the configure log and figure out why it failed?
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> The server list produced by "fs getserverprefs" does not necessarily
> indicate that the listed "file servers" are registered in your vldb.
> The "fs getserverprefs" output lists known file servers without any
> cell information
To Any interested parties:
Our lab needed a superior native PPC64 development platform and decided
upon Apple G5 (dual processor) hardware loaded with the Yellow Dog
distribution 4.1.
We are an AFS centric culture, and so the ability to attach this platform
to our file system was critical to
The server list produced by "fs getserverprefs" does not necessarily
indicate that the listed "file servers" are registered in your vldb.
The "fs getserverprefs" output lists known file servers without any
cell information (so you don't know what cell they belong to) nor
does it indicate how they w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I recognized some strange servers in my OpenAFS cell.
I run the afsss.pl srcipt to get a overview of my servers and volumes.
Til yesterday it worked quite well.
But today it gives me some errors:
querying servers for partitions: 172...rxi_sendmsg
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Leroy Tennison wrote:
Installed the Windows client, logged into afs, created the drive mapping
in the client, went into Windows Explorer and tried to view the drive
{which is labeled 'auto1 on afs (F:)'} but nothing was there. Tride
Properties and got a long apuse but
Leroy Tennison wrote:
I'm not sure whether the RoadWarriors comment is a genuine question or
a point being made with a question but I recently heard of an
alternative to opening the firewall to Microsoft which some may find
useful. A variant of VNC called Ultra VNC allows file transfer - just
22 matches
Mail list logo
