Re: [OpenAFS] Questions regarding a vos move

2006-10-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Madhusudan Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To balance the load across partitions on our group AFS cell, I am > thinking of moving some user volumes from /vicepa to /vicepb. I have a > user.xyz.backup volume inside each user.xyz mounted at OldFiles. Will it > be properly moved if I were to just

Re: [OpenAFS] Questions regarding a vos move

2006-10-04 Thread Kim Kimball
Hello, The mount point to the .backup volume is inside the volume you're moving, so the mount point will move properly as part of user.xya user.xyz.backup however is destroyed during the move and to avoid 'connection timed out' messages I suggest 'vos backup user.xyz' after moving the volume

[OpenAFS] Questions regarding a vos move

2006-10-04 Thread Madhusudan Singh
Hello, To balance the load across partitions on our group AFS cell, I am thinking of moving some user volumes from /vicepa to /vicepb. I have a user.xyz.backup volume inside each user.xyz mounted at OldFiles. Will it be properly moved if I were to just move user.xyz ? Second, the syntax for v

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS 1.4.2fc2 and Vanilla Linux kernel 2.6.18

2006-10-04 Thread Jeffrey Hutzelman
On Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:06:51 AM -0700 Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i also get an oops on debian on an amd64 (kernel 2.6.18, latest debian package which is based on fc4): The oops in check_table on amd64 is a known problem; work on a fix is in progress. _

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS 1.4.2fc2 and Vanilla Linux kernel 2.6.18

2006-10-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i also get an oops on debian on an amd64 (kernel 2.6.18, latest debian > package which is based on fc4): Yeah, this is a different problem, which we're currently tracking down. This one won't turn up on x86, though. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS 1.4.2fc2 and Vanilla Linux kernel 2.6.18

2006-10-04 Thread Alex Romosan
Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You kids and your wacky reply to all reply list pruned. > >> Found system call table at 0x803e2d20 (pattern scan) >> Found 32-bit system call table at 0x803e3bb0 (pattern scan) >> Starting AFS cache scan...<1>Unable to handle ker

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.4.2fc2 and Vanilla Linux kernel 2.6.18

2006-10-04 Thread Derrick J Brashear
You kids and your wacky reply to all reply list pruned. Found system call table at 0x803e2d20 (pattern scan) Found 32-bit system call table at 0x803e3bb0 (pattern scan) Starting AFS cache scan...<1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0c7f RIP: [] :

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.4.2fc2 and Vanilla Linux kernel 2.6.18

2006-10-04 Thread Miroslav Ruda
Russ Allbery wrote: > "chas williams <- CONTRACTOR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,FB writes: > >>> * OpenAFS 1.4.2rc2 (it's the latest debian package available) > >> while its the latest debian package, 1.4.2rc2 has several known bugs that >> have been fixed in