On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
If someone can provide a script to easily "notice" update kernels available
for (RPM, at least) platforms we support I will work on getting something
automated to kick out more builds.
how about this:
curl -l
ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distr
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Derek Atkins wrote:
Dan Pritts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
openafs.org won't necessarily issue RPMs for each and every RHEL point
kernel release but rebuilding and making your own is not too hard; you'd
just have to build your own openafs-kernel rpms that contained the modu
Dan Pritts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> openafs.org won't necessarily issue RPMs for each and every RHEL point
> kernel release but rebuilding and making your own is not too hard; you'd
> just have to build your own openafs-kernel rpms that contained the module
> for the newest point release, put
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:50:39AM -0500, Steve Devine wrote:
> I know that we can get Fedora rpms from openafs but I question how
> closely they follow the kernel releases.
> How is Debian, Ubuntu , Slackware , Mandriva in this regard? Would we
> get better results with Red Hat Enterprise?
You'l
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Wolfgang Friebel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
Does anyone have any experience using legato networker to back up afs
volumes?
...
We have built a solution around Legato Networker that is using both full and
incremental dumps using 'vos dump'. The resulti
On Nov 8, 2006, at 10:50, Steve Devine wrote:
For years we have maintained classroom 'gateway' boxes that ran an afs
client and exported user space via samba.
These machines were always Suns of some flavor running Solaris.
Now we have been mandated to migrate to x86 and we have been
experiment
One might contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] He was in charge of OpenAFS.
He insists on a stable release, whatever that is to him.
tedc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steve Devine
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:39 AM
To: 'OpenAFS-Info'
Subj
seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 08:25 -0800, ted creedon wrote:
>
>
>> It's a small price to pay for something that works. And Novell is protected
>> from future MS infringement claims.
>>
>
> If you're going to use the above as a claim for why to buy a novell
> product then it mi
You are correct, "They're up to something".
-Original Message-
From: seth vidal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'OpenAFS-Info'
Subject: RE: [OpenAFS] Linux afs client suggestions.
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 08:25 -0800, ted cree
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 08:25 -0800, ted creedon wrote:
> It's a small price to pay for something that works. And Novell is protected
> from future MS infringement claims.
If you're going to use the above as a claim for why to buy a novell
product then it might be best to mention that novell decidi
SuSE is a well developed and integrated package. All that is needed is the
desktop version for $50+bucks, unlimited usage.
OpenAFS works well with SuSE and development fixes are typically 24 hour
turnaround.
It's a small price to pay for something that works. And Novell is protected
from future M
> How is Debian, Ubuntu , Slackware , Mandriva in this regard?
i am using debian sarge with openafs 1.4.2 (build from source) and
kernel 2.6.18.2. works well... update (to kernel or openafs client) +
rebuild is quite simple.
also, i have created a simple custom script to load the correct
libafs.
For years we have maintained classroom 'gateway' boxes that ran an afs
client and exported user space via samba.
These machines were always Suns of some flavor running Solaris.
Now we have been mandated to migrate to x86 and we have been
experimenting with different Linux OS's.
We would very much
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 22:57, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yup, that's because it's not GPL (it's released under the IBM Public
> License).
>
> However, normally it will build anyway. It sounds like there's some sort
> of additional restriction on sparc64 that's not present on x86 or amd64
> (at lea
Matt Benjamin wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> I recall seeting the IFS working (by some definition of "working") on
> Eric JW's workstation in 2005. What specifically are the missing
> features that must be implemented to complete the work?
>
> Matt
Matt:
(1) the current code works on pre-Vista 32-bit plat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Madhusudan Singh wrote:
> Hello
>
> At least one (and possibly two) hard disks on the machine (has RAID 5 -
> rebuild did not help too much) that runs our openafs cell failed today. This
> is a Debian machine. Partition /usr is down and attemp
16 matches
Mail list logo
