I wrote:
it was the backup volume that went bad.
Sorry, I wanted to say:
The deletion of the clone on the source failed.
Harald.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Harald Barth wrote:
Derrick wrote 2006-09-12:
I need to think about this though...
And?
And what? I guess I get to go look up context :p
I think I have the same problem with 1.4.2 release
(+patch-namei-speedup).
Which is the fsync removal patch?
Both servers on
On Friday, December 08, 2006 01:09:04 PM -0600 Christopher D. Clausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Edgecombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being able to have snapshots of a volume or multiple backups of a
volume from different times.
I think the simplest approach would be to clone a volume
Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, December 08, 2006 01:09:04 PM -0600 Christopher D.
Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Edgecombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being able to have snapshots of a volume or multiple backups of a
volume from different times.
I think the
Anyone (cmu folks -- poke poke) have an updated version of adm
that'll build with openafs-1.4 headers libraries without a lot of
beating?
-rob
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
On Dec 7, 2006, at 8:48 PM, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
I second Rodney's suggestion. Disclaimer: his office is next to
mine ;)
Being able to have snapshots of a volume or multiple backups of a
volume from different times.
I think the simplest approach would be to clone a volume and give a
Not ADM, but I rewrote EMT in Python several years
ago.
http://vect.sourceforge.net/
We've been using that same 1.0 release since that time
(2002) and continue to do so.
Be sure to read 'Differences Between VECT and EMT'
before you download.
Robert Banz wrote:
Anyone (cmu folks -- poke
--On Monday, December 11, 2006 04:46:09 PM -0500 Robert Banz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone (cmu folks -- poke poke) have an updated version of adm that'll
build with openafs-1.4 headers libraries without a lot of beating?
We are running a adm servers/clients built against 1.4.x
