RE: FW: [OpenAFS] Turning interfaces off

2007-05-21 Thread ted creedon
Physically disconnected the exterior lan cable, did a vos changeaddress to 10.1.1.194 then had to manually vos remsite 4 each sites per volume with address 10.1.1.194 for each volume, did a vos release and all is working without external lan. Looks like the multiple replication sites on each

[OpenAFS] cyrus with storage in afs?

2007-05-21 Thread Adam Megacz
Hello, all. We (hcoop.net) currently have Courier working using Maildirs stored in afs (OpenAFS client, OpenAFS server). It's working quite well, except for the fact that courier's authentication mechanism is extremely kludgey and required a good bit of hacking in order to make it utilize

Re: [OpenAFS] cyrus with storage in afs?

2007-05-21 Thread Robert Banz
Cyrus was designed to use a local filesystem with Unix semantics and a working mmap()/write() combination. AFS doesn't provide these semantics so won't work correctly. http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/cgi-bin/dwww?type=filelocation=/usr/ share/doc/cyrus21-doc/html/faq.html Is this still the

Re: [OpenAFS] cyrus with storage in afs?

2007-05-21 Thread Chaskiel M Grundman
Whether or not cyrus works with afs now, it does not seem to be a good fit for your scenario. cyrus is a black box mail system. All the mail files are owned by the cyrus user and live in filesystem trees designated as cyrus partitions. The daemons all run as the cyrus user and PAM

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: File corruption, 1.4.1 1.4.4 on linux clients

2007-05-21 Thread cball
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are serving up a virus .dat file to mail relays via AFS readonly. The file is periodically updated, the volume where it lives is re-released hourly whether update occured or not. Read

Re: [OpenAFS] Turning interfaces off

2007-05-21 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Sun, 20 May 2007, ted creedon wrote: Unless I've missed something, afs now listens to any interface that is up, internal and external. now, as in this epoch? I thought that afs listened only to the interface that carried the host address and additional addresses could be added via the