Hi
I'm using CentOS 5, a RHEL 5 rebuild. I just dowdnloaded the source rpm
and did
# rpmbuild --rebuild openafs-1.4.4-rhel4.2.src.rpm --define 'osvers
rhel5'
Then the rpms can be found in e.g. /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/. Works
fine for me. There are also prebuild rpms available in the
Looking at the Redhat distros that are supported, the newer builds are
not present. (RH5 is out was well as newer RH4, the current kernel is
several version newer than what has packages available.)
Yes. It takes a serious amount of manpower to keep up with the
zillions of Linux versions in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Simmons wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
I looking for a production ready distributed file system.
. . .
I have been looking for a good printed book to read though to learn
more, but really can't find much.
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:57:04PM +0200, El Barto wrote:
HI I have a little problem with acl and the system:administrators
group.
I remove the right for system:administrators on my afs volume :
([EMAIL PROTECTED] 105)fs la
Access list for . is
Normal rights:
vadot_e rlidwka
On 7/17/07, Harald Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the Redhat distros that are supported, the newer builds are
not present. (RH5 is out was well as newer RH4, the current kernel is
several version newer than what has packages available.)
Yes. It takes a serious amount of
It had been a long time since I have rebuilt packages from source and I
was struggling with that a bit. I had it all but the define. That made
a world of difference!
I've got it installed; now I will figure out how to use it!
Thank you!
--
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Moritz
The listed ACL also states that the user 'vodot_e' (you, I think) can
change the ACL.
Just make sure that you have tokens, either for a system administrator,
or for 'vodot_e'
Kim
Frank Burkhardt wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:57:04PM +0200, El Barto wrote:
HI I have a
This actually works, but results in whiny messages from AFS when you
do vos examines. After some thought, I think the right direction is
to have a different 'type' of read-only volume.
The problem - users writing into restored volumes.
The solution - make restore volumes read-only.
The
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:54:53 +0200
Frank Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Members of system:administrators have implicit 'l' and 'a' everywhere.
You should be able to set ACLs as admin.
This is also configurable by the fileserver command line option
-implicit. The l and a rights are just the
