-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Now we got a GBit switch in our department and I want to test the speed
of our AFS servers.
With scp I gain speeds of 30 MB/Sec between a backup server and my client.
With OpenAFS I gain max speed of 10 MB/sec from AFS fileserver 1 to my
client
Hi,
I did some benchmarks to find out, which filesystem is best:
http://fbo.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Instantafs/WhichFs
Now my boss want's me to use ext3, I would prefer reiser3 - difficult
decision :-) .
Regards,
Frank
___
OpenAFS-info mailing
Thanks for this, Frank.
Kim Kimball
Frank Burkhardt wrote:
Hi,
I did some benchmarks to find out, which filesystem is best:
http://fbo.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Instantafs/WhichFs
Now my boss want's me to use ext3, I would prefer reiser3 - difficult
decision :-) .
Regards,
Frank
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Frank Burkhardt wrote:
Hi,
I did some benchmarks to find out, which filesystem is best:
http://fbo.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Instantafs/WhichFs
Now my boss want's me to use ext3, I would prefer reiser3 - difficult
decision :-) .
What version of OpenAFS did you test
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Frank Burkhardt wrote:
Hi,
I did some benchmarks to find out, which filesystem is best:
http://fbo.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Instantafs/WhichFs
thanks for sharing this. Are you reading linux-ide-arrays? There was a
thread this week where someone pointed out
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Lars Schimmer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Now we got a GBit switch in our department and I want to test the speed
of our AFS servers.
With scp I gain speeds of 30 MB/Sec between a backup server and my client.
With OpenAFS I gain max speed of
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Frank Burkhardt wrote:
Sorry. It's 1.4.4 - I just updated the page.
Cool. I imagine your XFS performance would improve greatly with the no
fsync patch that's been discussed on here.
And a few comments on reiser. If you ever need to do a fsck on it (which we
have
On Jul 19, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Kim Kimball wrote:
Why not restore the volume (restores to RW), replicate it (same
server and partition) and then remove the RW?
Mount the resulting readonly explicitly -- i.e. be sure to include
the .readonly suffix in the fs mkm
Works for me.
Works
On Jul 20, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Michael C Garrison wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Frank Burkhardt wrote:
Sorry. It's 1.4.4 - I just updated the page.
Cool. I imagine your XFS performance would improve greatly with the
no fsync patch that's been discussed on here.
And a few comments on
Steve Simmons wrote:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Kim Kimball wrote:
Why not restore the volume (restores to RW), replicate it (same
server and partition) and then remove the RW?
Mount the resulting readonly explicitly -- i.e. be sure to include
the .readonly suffix in the fs mkm
Works
Oh, I see, you're doing vos exa foo and not vos exa foo.readonly and
getting the message Dump only information ... blah
Missed the earlier part of the discussion -- why is this an issue?
Kim
Steve Simmons wrote:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Kim Kimball wrote:
Why not restore the volume
11 matches
Mail list logo