Re: [OpenAFS] Some questions about AFS

2008-01-19 Thread Anders Magnusson
Jeffrey Altman skrev: I tested by adding 64k mountpoints (volumes) in one directory, and accessing directories below did not become noticeably slower. The only peculiarity I noted was that Windows explorer only showed the first 1000 entries, but I don't know if it is a bug in explorer

Re: [OpenAFS] Some questions about AFS

2008-01-19 Thread Anders Magnusson
Harald Barth skrev: Ok, thanks. A related question to this is how database replication works, the databases became quite large. 80MB prdb and 40MB vldb. Will it only copy changed entries or may the whole database be copied? Oh, I'm a bit astonished... -rw--- 1 root bin

Re: [OpenAFS] Some questions about AFS

2008-01-19 Thread Steve Devine
Anders Magnusson wrote: Jeffrey Altman skrev: I tested by adding 64k mountpoints (volumes) in one directory, and accessing directories below did not become noticeably slower. The only peculiarity I noted was that Windows explorer only showed the first 1000 entries, but I don't know if

Re: [OpenAFS] Some questions about AFS

2008-01-19 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Anders Magnusson wrote: Hm, ok. Is kaserver used if the servers are running on Windows? And would it be difficult to fix the account manager to work against any server? The Account Manager is essentially a graphical 'kadmin' for kaserver. If you want a graphical 'kadmin' for Heimdal or