Folks,
With my RHEL 5 deployment I've begun using the -fakestat-all flag which
I'd hoped would make things work better and faster producing less load
on our AFS servers.
However, we have discovered that if AFS client B altered files used by
AFS client A with the fakestat-all flag that AFS client
Hello guys,
I have a problem with AFS at home, which stopped working a few
months ago, and I am not sure why. I THINK udp is blocked somewhere,
maybe by my NAT/router box, maybe by AOL. I think 'nc' seems like a good
(linux) tool to test things, but I am not used to it. Can anyone
suggest
Hi Jeff,
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
AFS is a very stressful application for a file system. If there are
bugs in the SAN AFS would be more likely to find them than other
applications.
*grin* Try telling that to my management! I just sent an email calling
AFS an excellent network and storage dia
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please clarify what you are asking. Are you asking if you can use
> > the group definitions from cell A on ACLs in cell B?
>
> Yes.
>
>
> "Derrick Brashear" <[EMAIL PROTE
Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please clarify what you are asking. Are you asking if you can use
> the group definitions from cell A on ACLs in cell B?
Yes.
"Derrick Brashear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No. And my server has no creds to do a lookup in your realm
Sorry, I shoul
Thanks Russ.
I expected as much when I saw your posting from 2005 in answer to a
similar question.
This is a great data point for me.
Kim
Russ Allbery wrote:
Kim Kimball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We're using Hitachi USP and Hitachi 9585 SAN devices, and have had a
series of
Hi Jason,
Thanks!
Can you tell me which flavor of SAN you're using?
Kim
Jason Edgecombe wrote:
Robert Banz wrote:
AFS can't really cause "san issues" in that it's just another
application using your filesystem. In some cases, it can be quite a
heavy user of such, but since its only int
Thanks Rob!
Robert Banz wrote:
AFS can't really cause "san issues" in that it's just another
application using your filesystem. In some cases, it can be quite a
heavy user of such, but since its only interacting through the fs, its
not going to know anything about your underlying storage f
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Megacz wrote:
> > Does AFS support the use of pts groups in a remote (trusted) cell on
> > ACLs in the home cell?
>
> Please clarify what you are asking. Are you asking if you can use
> the group definitions from
Adam Megacz wrote:
Does AFS support the use of pts groups in a remote (trusted) cell on
ACLs in the home cell?
Please clarify what you are asking. Are you asking if you can use
the group definitions from cell A on ACLs in cell B?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Kim Kimball wrote:
SAN symptoms, for those interested
I'm seeing SCSI command timeouts and UFS log timeouts (on vice
partitions using the SAN for storage) on LUNS used for vicep's on the
Hitachi USP, and was seeing them also on the 9585 until a recent
configuration change.
At first I though
11 matches
Mail list logo