Well,
from my point of view AFS on Mac is possible, I use it daily.
Unfortunately Accessing to you AFS-Homedir does not work currently on
Mac OS 10.5. On 10.4 it does. That means, if you have your homedir and
useraccount locally on your iMac you can have access of AFS-data but
loggin in
Hi,
I tried upgrading an SMP RHEL4 client today with the 1.4.7 RPMs and
built the kernel module with rpmbuild the way I usually do. However,
although I specified --define kernvers 2.6.9-67.0.15.ELsmp
- which syntax always worked before, it built the non-SMP kernel module.
Booting to kernel
On 9 May 2008, at 01:51, Richard Brittain wrote:
Hi,
I tried upgrading an SMP RHEL4 client today with the 1.4.7 RPMs
and built the kernel module with rpmbuild the way I usually do.
However,
although I specified --define kernvers 2.6.9-67.0.15.ELsmp
- which syntax always worked before,
Short answer: Go for it. I know I speak for the rest of the AFS
support staff in our group at Umich when I say that.
Any longer answer would most be echoing the individual points back at
you going yeah, yeah.
Steve
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
I am in favor of this as well. I think it can only make OpenAFS
stronger. Having an 'organized official voice' to speak for OpenAfs
shows foresight and I believe it will be easier to raise funds. I have
often thought we should be supporting OpenAFS in some manner so maybe it
will be easier to
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 04:11:40PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
snip
Membership should be open to both individuals, as well as corporations
and organizations. I would be happy to individually pay between $5 and
$25 a year membership dues to support OpenAFS. I also think that anyone
