David:
I believe I was quite clear that Explorer ignores the information.
Explorer on XP and Vista simply do not attempt to obtain information
regarding the reparse point data when the file system is SMB.
I am very reluctant to ship this code when it has no visible
benefit and the potential ris
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Derrick Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OpenAFS has started down a path to formally organizing. One piece of
> the plan involves formalizing roles, and so provided here is a draft
> plan for the role of the gatekeepers as well as expectations of
> contributors
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> ... Comments welcome, either privately
>> or ideally to openafs-info@openafs.org .
>>
>> http://www.openafs.org/foundation/gatekeepers.html
>
> I note that item 3 of the gatekeeper responsibilities
> could negate the
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think that's the sort of agreement that Derrick has in mind
>
> Sorry, I did not interpret it that way.
Actually while I'd like copyright assignment I don't know that is it
generically tenable and I believe it's spe
>>
> I second that "it depends on the agreement" point. I'm fine with the
> GPL, BSD, MIT or IPL. My employer has allowed GPL submissions, but
> prohibited IPL submissions. My employer will not enter any agreement
> where disputes are required to be resolved in a state other than North
> Carolina.
> ... Comments welcome, either privately
> or ideally to openafs-info@openafs.org .
>
> http://www.openafs.org/foundation/gatekeepers.html
I note that item 3 of the gatekeeper responsibilities
could negate the necessity of including the contributor
responsibilities (since item 3 indicates the
This is EXCELLENT.
Maybe with the code in place, Explorer and other file managers will catch
up... .. maybe its just wishfull thinking.
What happens if you use a cygwin bash shell and do a ls ??
On 9/4/08, Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I added the code to the SMB Server to identi
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 05:31:48PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote:
>
>
>> As we move to make OpenAFS exist as a legal entity, this process needs
>> to be formalized. One possibility would be to have a contributor
>> agreement, similar to existing agreements from other proj
> I think that's the sort of agreement that Derrick has in mind
Sorry, I did not interpret it that way.
> ... Personally, I'd rather sign it once rather than
> providing a new copy with each code submission,
> since I can readily agree to something like that.
"Agreeing" each time with a "signe
"Buhrmaster, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would a more lightweight process be acceptable, in
> that any code needs to be accompanied by the
> equivalent of the Linux "Developers Certificate
> of Origin" signoff (by the developer)?
>
> That puts the onerous on the submitters to insure
> that
> As we move to make OpenAFS exist as a legal entity, this process needs
> to be formalized. One possibility would be to have a contributor
> agreement, similar to existing agreements from other projects, which
> at minimum any committer would need to sign. However there may be
> benefit in having
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 05:31:48PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote:
>
> As we move to make OpenAFS exist as a legal entity, this process needs
> to be formalized. One possibility would be to have a contributor
> agreement, similar to existing agreements from other projects, which
> at minimum any c
On 2008 Sep 4, at 17:48, Russ Allbery wrote:
Frank Burkhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is it possible to disable it?
Not without source code modifications.
Also, the change would likely need to be made to both OpenAFS and to
your Kerberos server; although with Heimdal it would be a krb5
Frank Burkhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:34:18AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> AFS uses K4 principal naming, so the PTS ID has to be rcmd.somehost.
>> AFS will map host/somehost.your.domain to rcmd.somehost internally
>> before checking ACLs.
> Thank you - that was
OpenAFS has always has implicit agreements for code and documentation
contributions, namely, changes to existing items needed to be
compatible with the existing license (typically IPL v1.0, but for
certain components, BSD, APSL, or the Sun RPC license)
As we move to make OpenAFS exist as a legal e
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Derrick Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OpenAFS has started down a path to formally organizing. One piece of
> the plan involves formalizing roles, and so provided here is a draft
> plan for the role of the gatekeepers as well as expectations of
> contributors
I added the code to the SMB Server to identify mount points and symlinks
as reparse points. The output using 4NT/TCMD from JP Software becomes
Directory of \\afs\athena#user.jaltman\*
12/31/1969 23:59 .
12/31/1969 23:59 ..
12/31/1969 23:59krbdev [\\afs\athena
Christof Hanke wrote:
> OK, I just thought so otherwise, because it seems to make a difference for
> those guys :
>
> http://www.superflexible.com/docs.htm#
> Look for :
> "The program does not follow NTFS Junction Points."
It certainly makes a difference if you are attempting to clone a file
sy
On Thursday 04 September 2008 15:06:05 Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> Christof Hanke wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:57:56 Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> >> Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
> >>> Would using mount points instead of symlinks to directories help with
> >>> this problem?
> >>
> >> Windows doesn'
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Jason C. Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Derrick Brashear wrote:
>
>>> How can I get the vlserver to report the external IP address for external
>>> requests?
>>>
>> It's supposed to report both and does for me. We don't know where the
>> request came from, and i
Christof Hanke wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:57:56 Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>> Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
>>> Would using mount points instead of symlinks to directories help with
>>> this problem?
>> Windows doesn't know about mount points. A mount point is a Directory
>> to Windows. Same
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:49:06AM -0500, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
[snip]
> ls -l uses the host's mapping of UID to names.
>
> So was the file written with the anonymous UID?
> ls -ln should show the UID.
> What mappings are /etc/passwd, NIS or LDAP?
I'm using the ptdb-nss-plugin which me
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:34:18AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Frank Burkhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've got a strange problem here. Some of my AFS-client-machines must
> > put some stuff into AFS on a regular basis. Since all of them have
> > a host/...-Keytab, I wanted to use
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:57:56 Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
> > Would using mount points instead of symlinks to directories help with
> > this problem?
>
> Windows doesn't know about mount points. A mount point is a Directory
> to Windows. Same behavior when removing a
24 matches
Mail list logo
