dave first wrote:
Yes, I am in full agreement about NOT using the root filesystem for
non-system data. In the department to which I belong, there's a bit
of a religious war about this. But these systems will be under my
control, and I fully subscribe to the notion of keeping application
data se
Yes, I am in full agreement about NOT using the root filesystem for
non-system data. In the department to which I belong, there's a bit
of a religious war about this. But these systems will be under my
control, and I fully subscribe to the notion of keeping application
data separate from the syst
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 01:39:26PM -0800, dave first wrote:
> Jaime - Excellent information. Thank you. I've been living in a
> Bottom line seems to be that /vicepXX must be mounted filesystems and
> not just directories created under the root.
>
> Correct?
Not quite. During installation you
Jaime - Excellent information. Thank you. I've been living in a
vacuum wrt AFS, and it's nice to have a dialog about the capabilities
and possibilities. I've already moved a test volume successfully, but
that was a on a test system. Now I need to understand physical
volumes as they relate to an
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Matt Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bryn,
>
> Is this a DAFS file server? If so, then probably a known behavior,
> although I'm not certain it should be seen in 1.5.55 (Tom?) As you imply,
> the volume can in that case be salvaged and then brought on-l
On 12/4/08, dave first <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I did this under the quickly departing tutelage of the admin
> who has left, and don't really understand some nuances about the
> structure yet.
You will learn, grasshopper.
> So, the question then becomes, can I just use directorie
David,
Thank you for responding.
Actually, I do have the server up and running under OpenAFS on Linux.
However, I did this under the quickly departing tutelage of the admin
who has left, and don't really understand some nuances about the
structure yet.
For example, the old Transarc AFS server ha
On 12/3/08, dave first <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to AFS. I have inherited an old, crusty, but functional
> Transarc AFS cluster of three servers running on Solaris 5.8.
> Unfortunately, the hardware has become unstable. I have installed
> OpenAFS server on Linux which c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm personally interested in SCTP, but having followed the tsvwg and
other development channels for more than a year, I'm not convinced that
SCTP is going to provide an immediate term viable bulk transport, though
it may turn out to be a brilliant ch
Dale Ghent wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Rainer Toebbicke wrote:
>
>> With unlimited development resources AFS would deserve a better suited
>> protocol than TCP, in practice with a little more realism my gut
>> feeling is that at least some more brain should be devoted to
>> improving plai
Hi Bryn,
Is this a DAFS file server? If so, then probably a known behavior,
although I'm not certain it should be seen in 1.5.55 (Tom?) As you
imply, the volume can in that case be salvaged and then brought on-line
(bos salvage -forceDAFS).
Matt
Bryn Divey wrote:
Hi all,
I've compiled
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Dale Ghent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Rainer Toebbicke wrote:
>
>> With unlimited development resources AFS would deserve a better suited
>> protocol than TCP, in practice with a little more realism my gut feeling is
>> that at least so
Hi all,
I've compiled OpenAFS 1.5.55 to debs to check out the read/write
disconnected operation stuff, and I'm getting errors on various volume
operations.
For example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ vos create ubuntu-dfs.hostname.com /vicepa root.cell
-cell hostname.com
Failed to end the transaction on t
13 matches
Mail list logo
