Re: [OpenAFS] Please install afsd with check server daemon.

2009-09-11 Thread Derrick Brashear
it means some thread triggered a code path that noticed the checkserver daemon hadn't started before it started :) Derrick On Sep 11, 2009, at 23:04, Jeff Blaine wrote: I switched a box from disk cache to memcache tonight and got this message upon reboot. Please install afsd with check

[OpenAFS] Please install afsd with check server daemon.

2009-09-11 Thread Jeff Blaine
I switched a box from disk cache to memcache tonight and got this message upon reboot. Please install afsd with check server daemon. I've never seen this message before. What does it mean? ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org htt

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: vos listaddrs and "fake" fileserver addresses

2009-09-11 Thread Jason Edgecombe
Would putting a NetRestrict file on the clients do any good? Jason Derrick Brashear wrote: at the moment serverprefs is as good as you can get. you want a split horizon vlserver; at the moment there is no such animal Derrick On Sep 10, 2009, at 22:28, "Ryan C. Underwood" wrote: Yeah,

[OpenAFS] Estimate of size to be transferred in 'vos release' ?

2009-09-11 Thread Richard Brittain
Hi, is there any easy way to tell by examining the RW volume and existing RO replicates, how much data will be transferred when we do a 'vos release' (a -dryrun flag ?). I'm setting up automatic releases for large user data volumes and while most will be small, they could potentially be ve

Re: [OpenAFS] ADS communications issue?

2009-09-11 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Eric Chris Garrison wrote: Okay, we "solved" the ADS/MTU problem for one supercomputer... what it turned up was that our AFS servers were only able to do 1500 MTU, but the router they were on accepted jumbo (9000 MTU) frames and passed them on, so they fragmented. We had them set up our VLAN t

Re: [OpenAFS] ADS communications issue?

2009-09-11 Thread Derrick Brashear
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Eric Chris Garrison wrote: > Okay, we "solved" the ADS/MTU problem for one supercomputer... what it > turned up was that our AFS servers were only able to do 1500 MTU, but the > router they were on accepted jumbo (9000 MTU) frames and passed them on, > so they frag

Re: [OpenAFS] ADS communications issue?

2009-09-11 Thread Eric Chris Garrison
Okay, we "solved" the ADS/MTU problem for one supercomputer... what it turned up was that our AFS servers were only able to do 1500 MTU, but the router they were on accepted jumbo (9000 MTU) frames and passed them on, so they fragmented. We had them set up our VLAN to not accept jumbo frames, and