Re: [OpenAFS] Ideas for finer grain set acl controls

2009-10-31 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Sergio Gelato wrote: > * Jeffrey Altman [2009-10-30 13:20:12 -0400]: >> To address the use case properly there needs to be the ability to apply >> additional sets of ACLs controlled entirely by the administrator. >> Positive ACLs that give privileges that cannot be restricted and >> negative ACLs t

Re: [OpenAFS] Limit of clones

2009-10-31 Thread Derrick Brashear
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Anders Magnusson wrote: > The manpage for vos clone says there are a maximum of 7 clones using the > namei fileserver. > What is the reason for this limitation? The implementation uses only 3 bits (1 + 2 + 4 = 7) Given that in a classic fileserver, RW, RO, BK, t

Re: [OpenAFS] Ideas for finer grain set acl controls

2009-10-31 Thread Sergio Gelato
* Jeffrey Altman [2009-10-30 13:20:12 -0400]: > To address the use case properly there needs to be the ability to apply > additional sets of ACLs controlled entirely by the administrator. > Positive ACLs that give privileges that cannot be restricted and > negative ACLs that restrict privileges tha

[OpenAFS] Limit of clones

2009-10-31 Thread Anders Magnusson
The manpage for vos clone says there are a maximum of 7 clones using the namei fileserver. What is the reason for this limitation? -- Ragge ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info