[OpenAFS] Re: More EINVAL's with 1.5.68

2009-12-27 Thread Adam Megacz
Andrew Deason writes: > They are probably performing a difference sequence of syscalls on the > file, or using different flags, etc. Is this reliably reproducible? > fstrace dumps could be more enlightening, Yes, but only until I reboot. I posted the fstrace (see previous thread) but was told t

Re: [OpenAFS] Current OpenAFS Backup Recommendations

2009-12-27 Thread Dan Pritts
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:41:17PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote: > What's the current status regarding OpenAFS backup solutions? I don't think anyone else has mentioned backuppc4afs. We've been running it for a bit now in parallel to our older system and it seems to work reasonably well. It is dis

[OpenAFS] Re: More EINVAL's with 1.5.68

2009-12-27 Thread Andrew Deason
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:47:58 -0800 Adam Megacz wrote: > > Strange, I can "cat" the file in question, but for some reason Ruby > programs (I don't know Ruby) choke on it. They are probably performing a difference sequence of syscalls on the file, or using different flags, etc. Is this reliably r

[OpenAFS] More EINVAL's with 1.5.68

2009-12-27 Thread Adam Megacz
Strange, I can "cat" the file in question, but for some reason Ruby programs (I don't know Ruby) choke on it. - a /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1039:in `read': Invalid argument - /afs/megacz.com/user/m/me/megacz/.netstiff/store.new (Errno::EINVAL) from