Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Setting the BOS Server's Restart Times

2010-01-12 Thread Matt W. Benjamin
well done - "Andrew Deason" wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:19:09 + > Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > > > > On 12 Jan 2010, at 23:12, Gary Gatling wrote: > > > > > Thanks a lot for all the replys. Its sounds like we don't need to > > > be restarting afs every week since we are using a mod

[OpenAFS] Re: Setting the BOS Server's Restart Times

2010-01-12 Thread Andrew Deason
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:19:09 + Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > On 12 Jan 2010, at 23:12, Gary Gatling wrote: > > > Thanks a lot for all the replys. Its sounds like we don't need to > > be restarting afs every week since we are using a modern (1.4.11) > > release of afs. > > I suspect that we

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Setting the BOS Server's Restart Times

2010-01-12 Thread Simon Wilkinson
On 12 Jan 2010, at 23:12, Gary Gatling wrote: Thanks a lot for all the replys. Its sounds like we don't need to be restarting afs every week since we are using a modern (1.4.11) release of afs. I suspect that we should probably change the default bos configuration, and the installation i

[OpenAFS] Re: Setting the BOS Server's Restart Times

2010-01-12 Thread Gary Gatling
Thanks a lot for all the replys. Its sounds like we don't need to be restarting afs every week since we are using a modern (1.4.11) release of afs. Cheers, Gary Gatling | ITECS Systems ITECS, BOX 7901 | Operations and Systems Analyst NCSU, Raleigh, NC | Email: gsgat...@eos.ncsu.edu 27

Re: [OpenAFS] kerberos 5 encryption types status

2010-01-12 Thread Matt W. Benjamin
Hi, Interested folks are welcome to try rxk5 in its current form. Feel free to email me or Marcus if this would be helpful to you. Regards, Matt - "Russ Allbery" wrote: > Jack Neely writes: > > > I'm researching upgrading our aging (1.2) Kerberos 5 infrastructure > to > > 1.6. I'm at

Re: [OpenAFS] kerberos 5 encryption types status

2010-01-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Jack Neely writes: > I'm researching upgrading our aging (1.2) Kerberos 5 infrastructure to > 1.6. I'm attempting to figure out how the upgrade and new encryption > types would affect our AFS deployment. Russ's email from 2007 was > helpful in this: > http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/opena

[OpenAFS] kerberos 5 encryption types status

2010-01-12 Thread Jack Neely
Folks, I'm researching upgrading our aging (1.2) Kerberos 5 infrastructure to 1.6. I'm attempting to figure out how the upgrade and new encryption types would affect our AFS deployment. Russ's email from 2007 was helpful in this: http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2007-March/0255

[OpenAFS] Windows client and firewall/antivirus/MTU conflict - possibility of file corruption

2010-01-12 Thread Richard Brittain
Hi all, we have noticed file corruption in certain circumstances when using the OpenAFS for Windows client in combination with antivirus products and non-default network MTU settings. Isolating exactly what factors _must_ be present has been a challenge, but with tremendous help from Jeff A

Re: [OpenAFS] Localized (non en_US version) of 1.5.68 for Windows available?

2010-01-12 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 1/12/2010 8:50 AM, Holger Rauch wrote: > Hi, > > I downloaded version 1.5.68 for Win and tried to install it on a Win > XP Professional SP3 system (32bit). > > The install of the required KfW 3.2.2 went smoothly and I can also use > it for passwordless SSH logins via a PuTTY with GSSAPI suppor

Re: [OpenAFS] Windows 7 64bit, OpenAFS 1.5.68 and networks

2010-01-12 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 1/12/2010 7:44 AM, Lars Schimmer wrote: > Hi! > > Is anyone running Windows 7 64bit with OpenAFS 1.5.68 in a AD > environment and has discovered malfunction of OpenAFS after > reconfiguring the network interfaces? > > E.g. if I login as a domain user to win7, all works fine til I plugin a > bl

Re: [OpenAFS] file ownership for root (UID 0)

2010-01-12 Thread Derek Atkins
"Karl Tißner" writes: >> > Since it is not possible to create an user with AFS UID "0", all files >> > created by root are not owned by root (Debian Linux, root has UID 0): >> > >> > # pts createuser -name testtest -id 0 >> > 0 isn't a valid user id; aborting >> > >> > What is the standard way

[OpenAFS] Re: file ownership for root (UID 0)

2010-01-12 Thread Andrew Deason
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:50:32 +0100 "Karl Tißner" wrote: > > > Since it is not possible to create an user with AFS UID "0", all > > > files created by root are not owned by root (Debian Linux, root > > > has UID 0): > > > > > > # pts createuser -name testtest -id 0 > > > 0 isn't a valid user id;

[OpenAFS] Localized (non en_US version) of 1.5.68 for Windows available?

2010-01-12 Thread Holger Rauch
Hi, I downloaded version 1.5.68 for Win and tried to install it on a Win XP Professional SP3 system (32bit). The install of the required KfW 3.2.2 went smoothly and I can also use it for passwordless SSH logins via a PuTTY with GSSAPI support. However, as soon as I checked the three recommended

[OpenAFS] Windows 7 64bit, OpenAFS 1.5.68 and networks

2010-01-12 Thread Lars Schimmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Is anyone running Windows 7 64bit with OpenAFS 1.5.68 in a AD environment and has discovered malfunction of OpenAFS after reconfiguring the network interfaces? E.g. if I login as a domain user to win7, all works fine til I plugin a bluetooth stic