At what point should the 1.5.xx series be considered "usable" on Linux?
I'm thinking usable as 1.4.xx is, not trying disconnected mode, at the
moment.
I've tried Linux clients from 1.5.71-73 with varying amounts of
success, but in no case has it been sufficient. A quick look at my
domain, and y
Hello,
We have had to replace our master openafs fileserver several times. Each
time we have had to go through each client and update the CellServDB file to
reflect the IP address of the new replacement server. Since we always map a
domain name to the master openafs fileserver, is it possible to s
Dale Pontius writes:
> At what point should the 1.5.xx series be considered "usable" on Linux?
> I'm thinking usable as 1.4.xx is, not trying disconnected mode, at the
> moment.
I finally got a working build on Debian with 1.5.73.3 plus two additional
patches (one of which has been merged and on
Ken Elkabany writes:
> We have had to replace our master openafs fileserver several times. Each
> time we have had to go through each client and update the CellServDB
> file to reflect the IP address of the new replacement server. Since we
> always map a domain name to the master openafs fileserv
On 7 Apr 2010, at 19:28, Russ Allbery wrote:
I agree with your general impression
that up until now we've not really been there on Linux, but we seem
to be
stabilizing.
Those of us actively developing on Linux have been running the 1.5
series for ages. The fact that other people are seei
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ken Elkabany writes:
>
>> We have had to replace our master openafs fileserver several times. Each
>> time we have had to go through each client and update the CellServDB
>> file to reflect the IP address of the new replacement server. Since w
On 04/07/10 14:28, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Dale Pontius writes:
>
>
>> At what point should the 1.5.xx series be considered "usable" on Linux?
>> I'm thinking usable as 1.4.xx is, not trying disconnected mode, at the
>> moment.
>>
> I finally got a working build on Debian with 1.5.73.3 plus
A year or two back I was having some odd cache issues with the stable
client. I hacked the init script (This is Gentoo, by the way.) to
clear
the cache each time right before starting the client.
And, of course, you reported these problems, and we fixed them in a
later release?
I'll c
Derrick Brashear writes:
> Or name just cells you want with this behavior as e.g.
> >cell.name #Whatever
> instead of
> >cell.name #Whatever
> IP #host
I didn't know you could do that. Added to the man page in:
http://gerrit.openafs.org/1710
--
Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu)
Simon Wilkinson writes:
> Those of us actively developing on Linux have been running the 1.5
> series for ages. The fact that other people are seeing problems would
> seem to indicate that testing across a wider variety of systems is
> required. Unfortunately, we don't have the time, or the syste
On 04/07/10 14:38, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
>
> On 7 Apr 2010, at 19:28, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>> I agree with your general impression
>> that up until now we've not really been there on Linux, but we seem
>> to be
>> stabilizing.
>
> Those of us actively developing on Linux have been running the 1
On 04/07/10 14:49, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
>>>
>> A year or two back I was having some odd cache issues with the stable
>> client. I hacked the init script (This is Gentoo, by the way.) to clear
>> the cache each time right before starting the client.
>
> And, of course, you reported these proble
Dale Pontius writes:
> On 04/07/10 14:49, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
>> fs whereis . will tell you.
> Thanks, that does give the server name. Now is there a command that
> will give meaningful and useful (to you) information about that server?
> I doubt I have any sort of shell access to any of th
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:14:31 -0400
Dale Pontius wrote:
> > fs whereis . will tell you.
>
> Thanks, that does give the server name. Now is there a command that
> will give meaningful and useful (to you) information about that
> server? I doubt I have any sort of shell access to any of them.
rxd
I have a web application in which I would like many client web-servers
to be able to read and write to many separate and modestly-sized
sqlite databases, exported by a master server. Each database
corresponds to an account, so we might have several concurrent users
accessing an individual DB every
15 matches
Mail list logo
