"John F. Godfrey" writes:
> A question about tokens on debian lenny. When I log back in, or come
> back through a screensaver that needs a password to authenticate, I get
> a renewed kerberos ticket. However, I don't get a new afs token, so
> have to do an aklog. Not a big deal, but is there a
Michael Meffie wrote:
Andrew Deason wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:07:41 -0400 Jason Edgecombe
wrote:
Can I use that patch against the 1.4.x tree?
Probably; I don't imagine pts code is very different. If it's
something that would be considered appropriate for 1.4, submit
the cherry pick to g
A question about tokens on debian lenny. When I log back in, or come
back through a screensaver that needs a password to authenticate, I get
a renewed kerberos ticket. However, I don't get a new afs token, so
have to do an aklog. Not a big deal, but is there a way to
change/adjust this behavior?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Rich Sudlow wrote:
> Andrew Deason wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:14:01 -0400
>> Rich Sudlow wrote:
>>
>>> I'm having problems with a volume going off-line and not
>>> coming back with Salvage - what is the maximum number
>>> of files per volume? I believe t
the best way to know it's fixed? watch the release announcements. it's
not like we're going to be coy about it.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Adam Megacz wrote:
>
> Jeffrey Altman writes:
>> When a whole file lock is write-held, all of the dirty data in the cache
>> must be written back to th
Jeffrey Altman writes:
> When a whole file lock is write-held, all of the dirty data in the cache
> must be written back to the file server before the lock is released.
> This is currently not being done and as a result, the database becomes
> corrupted.
>
> I suspect this will be fixed shortly.
Andrew Deason wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:07:41 -0400 Jason Edgecombe
wrote:
Can I use that patch against the 1.4.x tree?
Probably; I don't imagine pts code is very different. If it's
something that would be considered appropriate for 1.4, submit
the cherry pick to gerrit. Or Mike or I cou
Andrew Deason wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:47:33 -0400
Jason Edgecombe wrote:
Hi,
What is the difference between the new -expandgroups and -supergroups
options to the pts mem command? That seem identical in my reading.
-expandgroups just expands the listing of the normal pts output. So, if
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:32:15 +0200
Holger Rauch wrote:
> Sorry, didn't find anything about "-jumbo" in the afsd man page. So,
> to which daemon does this option belong to exactly?
Just server daemons. For your purposes in this thread, the fileserver is
the only relevant daemon to use it with. (I
Hi Jeffrey,
thanks for your reply.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> [...]
> Rx jumbograms have nothing to do with IPv6. OpenAFS has no IPv6 support
> at present. See "-jumbo" option on the UNIX CM
Sorry, didn't find anything about "-jumbo" in the afsd man page. So,
to which daemo
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:58:57 -0400
Rich Sudlow wrote:
> 04/26/2010 10:29:07 g.dial (536881461) updated 04/26/2010 04:22
> 04/26/2010 10:30:41 "Salvage volume group" core dumped!
Platform? Is this namei?
If you're missing the small/large vnode index as indicated by the
fileserver log below... I
Andrew Deason wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:14:01 -0400
Rich Sudlow wrote:
I'm having problems with a volume going off-line and not
coming back with Salvage - what is the maximum number
of files per volume? I believe the volume in question
has over 20 million.
Looks like there were actually
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:14:01 -0400
Rich Sudlow wrote:
> I'm having problems with a volume going off-line and not
> coming back with Salvage - what is the maximum number
> of files per volume? I believe the volume in question
> has over 20 million.
You'd need over 2 billion to saturate the vnode
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:40:40 +0200
Holger Rauch wrote:
> That exactly was my question: How do I actually use (read:
> enable/configure, etc.) memcache?
For Unix clients, pass -memcache to afsd. You also want to make sure
your cache isn't configured to be greater than your RAM when you do
that.
I'm having problems with a volume going off-line and not
coming back with Salvage - what is the maximum number
of files per volume? I believe the volume in question
has over 20 million.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Rich Sudlow
University of Notre Dame
Center for Research Computing
128 Information Technology
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Marcus Crestani
wrote:
>>"FC" == Fabien COMBERNOUS writes:
> FC> To answer to many of our questions, you can use fseventer tool [1]. It
> FC> is a useful free closed source software to know the files modified
> FC> and/or created by a GUI on MacOSX. I planed t
On 4/26/2010 3:32 AM, Holger Rauch wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, the maximum transfer speed on Windows is about 8-10
>>> MB/sec when I copy local files to an OpenAFS volume.
>>
>> This is common when encryption is in use, jumbo grams are disabled, and
>> the file server is running with its defaults.
>
On 4/26/2010 3:44 AM, Holger Rauch wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> Firstly, as I (and others) have mentioned, OpenAFS doesn't use DES, it uses
>> an encryption algorithm called fcrypt, which is a DES derivative.
>
> I
> Ok, but jumbo grams are an IPv6 only feature, right?
No. Unfortunately the name is quite overloaded. So I'd rather say "IP
packets sent on a network with an MTU > 1500". But that is rather
long. Normally people talk only about ethernet. Other technologies
have different default MTU sizes, for
Hi Simon,
thanks for your reply.
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
> [...]
> Firstly, as I (and others) have mentioned, OpenAFS doesn't use DES, it uses
> an encryption algorithm called fcrypt, which is a DES derivative.
I got the impression that DES was used because one has to use
Hi Lars,
thanks for your reply.
Lars Schimmer schrieb am Sunday, den 25. April 2010:
> [...] A network filesystem has some more needs
> than a local one ;-)
I'm aware of that, but even when I transfer a large .iso file (~ 600
MB) using scp to a remote host acting an an NFSv4 client and has a
fi
Hi Jeffrey,
thanks a lot for your reply.
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> [...]
> 1.5.74 is the current release.
Yes, but it wasn't at the time I setup up the Windows machine.
>
> > Unfortunately, the maximum transfer speed on Windows is about 8-10
> > MB/sec when I copy local fi
>"FC" == Fabien COMBERNOUS writes:
FC> To answer to many of our questions, you can use fseventer tool [1]. It
FC> is a useful free closed source software to know the files modified
FC> and/or created by a GUI on MacOSX. I planed to do it by myself, but i
FC> didn't yet have enough time.
Thank
23 matches
Mail list logo
