On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Simon Wilkinson s...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
On 20 Jun 2010, at 04:11, Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Matt W. Benjamin m...@linuxbox.com wrote:
wow. do we want that? replacement for rt?
Matt
- Adam Megacz a...@megacz.com wrote:
On 20 Jun 2010, at 12:37, Derrick Brashear wrote:
I assume since the commit messages are part of the sha1, we can't do
back and rewrite the world we have.
Indeed. But, gerrit will actually only know about changes with a fixes footer
that are committed after that patch is applied, so it's
Hi folks,
How does ext4 currently compare to ext3 and ext2 for reliability when
used with an OpenAFS client or file server? Of the people who have
tried it, are there any who can say that they are pleased with it, or
are most just sorry that they ever tried it?
Thanks,
Jaap
Is there a reason why tmpfs isn't supported (1.5.74)?
I was really hoping to start using it for my cache partitions with 1.5.x
and 1.6. It has all the advantages of memcache plus it can pushed out
to swap when there's memory pressure (which IIRC memcache cannot).
Currently I use dd to make a
Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net writes:
If afsd is being backgrounded, it is not by us. afsd only exits after it
tries to mount /afs. From what Russ says and from what I see in the
Debian init scripts, the Debian init scripts do not background it
either.
Yikes, I tried putting ls
On 20 Jun 2010, at 22:25, Adam Megacz wrote:
Is there a reason why tmpfs isn't supported (1.5.74)?
Because your kernel module and afsd aren't built with the USE_FH option, which
enables support for filesystems which have complex file descriptors. We turn on
USE_FH when the kernel doesn't
that shouldn't happen, but it wouldn't if the backgrounding weren't
happening.
Really? Still, even if I have a
while sleep 1 ; do
ls /afs/pdc.kth.se/ /dev/null 21
done
running in one window since before and during
/etc/init.d/afs start
in another window, it probably should not do
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Harald Barth h...@kth.se wrote:
that shouldn't happen, but it wouldn't if the backgrounding weren't
happening.
Really? Still, even if I have a
while sleep 1 ; do
ls /afs/pdc.kth.se/ /dev/null 21
done
running in one window since before and during
