Re: [OpenAFS] Openafs Client with pam krb5 and ldap

2010-10-02 Thread Andy Cobaugh
On 2010-10-01 at 21:50, Russ Allbery ( r...@stanford.edu ) said: Russ Allbery r...@stanford.edu writes: Oh, I understand now. pam_unix fails, and you were expecting pam_krb5 to return success (blindly) to counter pam_unix's failure, but since pam_krb5 (correctly) returns PAM_IGNORE for users

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Latest docs on building the OpenAFS source code

2010-10-02 Thread Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)
In message aanlktikjjj16ckewiu9nyvygozvzzhqdoujtuxsnk...@mail.gmail.com,Derrick Brashear writes: On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Phillip Moore yeah. thing is, by and large most people don't need that either which is why it still works that way. we've been improving. i suspect openafs should be

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Latest docs on building the OpenAFS source code

2010-10-02 Thread Ted Creedon
In my LaTeX docs I had switches for the directories as well as for the system types. One could emit a SUN or Linux specific doc (or both) for example. Tedc On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) c...@cmf.nrl.navy.mil wrote: In message

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Latest docs on building the OpenAFS source code

2010-10-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) c...@cmf.nrl.navy.mil writes: i suspect openafs should be prefixing its build vars with AFS_ (or OPENAFS_) so that users can overload the 'standard' variabales. i believe this needs revisited anyway since i am not sure the existing variables are even used

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Latest docs on building the OpenAFS source code

2010-10-02 Thread Simon Wilkinson
On 2 Oct 2010, at 20:04, Russ Allbery wrote: Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) c...@cmf.nrl.navy.mil writes: i suspect openafs should be prefixing its build vars with AFS_ (or OPENAFS_) so that users can overload the 'standard' variabales. i believe this needs revisited anyway since i am not sure