Re: [OpenAFS] Packaging OpenAFS 1.6 for Fedora 15

2011-04-14 Thread Jonathan S Billings
On 04/14/2011 01:28 PM, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > You kernel is built with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK, which makes the whole > workqueue system GPL-only. OpenAFS won't work with such a kernel. Typically > Fedora build prerelease kernels with a lot of debugging enabled, which they > then remove fro

Re: [OpenAFS] Packaging OpenAFS 1.6 for Fedora 15

2011-04-14 Thread Marc Dionne
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 13:20, Jack Neely wrote: > Folks, > > I'm updating the Fedora 15 packages of OpenAFS in rpmFusion. I'm using > 1.6.0pre4 and I've applied the 2 patches from git relating to changes in > the 2.6.39 kernel. Specifically: > >a8aa6f4221309f44f49cdd00acce88122f1753f6 >

Re: [OpenAFS] Packaging OpenAFS 1.6 for Fedora 15

2011-04-14 Thread Simon Wilkinson
On 14 Apr 2011, at 18:20, Jack Neely wrote: > At this point the kernel module compiles but complains about GPL only > symbols: > >FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible module libafs.ko uses GPL-only >symbol '__init_work' > > I don't see anything in git that addresses this. Any ideas? You k

[OpenAFS] Packaging OpenAFS 1.6 for Fedora 15

2011-04-14 Thread Jack Neely
Folks, I'm updating the Fedora 15 packages of OpenAFS in rpmFusion. I'm using 1.6.0pre4 and I've applied the 2 patches from git relating to changes in the 2.6.39 kernel. Specifically: a8aa6f4221309f44f49cdd00acce88122f1753f6 1e322b883e036fe0bd5468fe60a0431545fe2376 At this point the ke

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: vos move speed rates

2011-04-14 Thread Chris Hoy Poy
Hi all, I've got a couple of XFS backed servers and a couple of EXT3 backed servers. My findings: The XFS backed servers consistently: - use less CPU in operations - occupy less disk space (I have a lot of homedirs on AFS, they use around 10-20% *less* space on AFS) - in gen