In the hunt for oddities regarding the new IFS Windows client I have
observed a problem causing bad performance, and hopefully someone has
some idea about what is going on.
Environment:
Server: OpenAFS 1.4.12.1, CentOS 5.3
Client: Windows 7, OpenAFS 1.7.1
The test case is to write an ISO
On 2011-09-21 13:09, Anders Magnusson wrote:
In the hunt for oddities regarding the new IFS Windows client I have
observed a problem causing bad performance, and hopefully someone has
some idea about what is going on.
Environment:
Server: OpenAFS 1.4.12.1, CentOS 5.3
Client: Windows 7, OpenAFS
On 09/21/2011 02:56 PM, Lars Schimmer wrote:
On 2011-09-21 13:09, Anders Magnusson wrote:
In the hunt for oddities regarding the new IFS Windows client I have
observed a problem causing bad performance, and hopefully someone has
some idea about what is going on.
Environment:
Server: OpenAFS
On 9/21/2011 7:09 AM, Anders Magnusson wrote:
In the hunt for oddities regarding the new IFS Windows client I have
observed a problem causing bad performance, and hopefully someone has
some idea about what is going on.
Environment:
Server: OpenAFS 1.4.12.1, CentOS 5.3
Client: Windows 7,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:42, Anders Magnusson ra...@ltu.se wrote:
...
No, state-of-the-art HP workstation. Note that this is more-or-less the
behaviour
of all our Win7 machines with the IFS client, all of them are really new
hardware.
This is a WAG, but high end workstations sometimes have
On 21.09.2011 16:42, Anders Magnusson wrote:
On 09/21/2011 02:56 PM, Lars Schimmer wrote:
On 2011-09-21 13:09, Anders Magnusson wrote:
In the hunt for oddities regarding the new IFS Windows client I have
observed a problem causing bad performance, and hopefully someone has
some idea about
Another facet of the foreign-realm groups: when creating a foreign-realm
group, I had to give it an explicit owner. The command pts
creategroup reports the id -206 for the newly created group, and so
does pts listentries; command pts examine shows the id -102,
and the name of the
Hi,
I'm trying out 1.6 on our Mac clients, and discovered that it seems to
have a fixed a Finder problem which existed in 1.4.x. With 1.4.x on OSX
10.5/6, we could not drag files 4GB to AFS (Finder returned unknown
error, code 0). This was specifically a Finder issue -- the command line
yes, presumed fixed.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Richard Brittain
richard.britt...@dartmouth.edu wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying out 1.6 on our Mac clients, and discovered that it seems to
have a fixed a Finder problem which existed in 1.4.x. With 1.4.x on OSX
10.5/6, we could not drag files
Hi,
I have to perform a fairly major upgrade on my Kerberos servers which
authenticate our Openafs cell, which means running with 2 different
kerberos servers, at least for a short while.
I'd like to create a keytab on the new server and add it to the
KeyFile of our existing servers. Then when a
On 21 Sep 2011, at 23:08, Dan Scott danieljamessc...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to perform a fairly major upgrade on my Kerberos servers which
authenticate our Openafs cell, which means running with 2 different
kerberos servers, at least for a short while.
Running with two different KDCs, both
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 18:23, Simon Wilkinson s...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
On 21 Sep 2011, at 23:08, Dan Scott danieljamessc...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to perform a fairly major upgrade on my Kerberos servers which
authenticate our Openafs cell, which means running with 2 different
12 matches
Mail list logo
