Re: [OpenAFS] recommended UFS parameters for cache partition?

2011-12-27 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:16:16 -0500 (EST) Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > (Or should I just not worry about it and assume that any potential > improvements would be lost in the noise?) other than i believe you still cannot use journaling on the caching partition, there isnt much to do. however, as wit

Re: [OpenAFS] recommended UFS parameters for cache partition?

2011-12-27 Thread Ted Creedon
Not necessarily true with on disk caching Disk heads dont recal after every seek On Tuesday, December 27, 2011, chas williams - CONTRACTOR < c...@cmf.nrl.navy.mil> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:16:16 -0500 (EST) > Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > >> (Or should I just not worry about it and assume tha

Re: [OpenAFS] recommended UFS parameters for cache partition?

2011-12-27 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
information is generally denser on the outer tracks because there is simply more space for data which requires less seeks. On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:51:15 -0600 Ted Creedon wrote: > Not necessarily true with on disk caching > > Disk heads dont recal after every seek > > On Tuesday, December 27, 2

Re: [OpenAFS] OS X Lion OpenAFS Client not acquiring ticket through "AFS Menu"

2011-12-27 Thread Thomas Smith
That resolved the issue! Thanks Derrick! On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote: > Try 1.6.1pre1 on Lion and let me know what you find > > Derrick > > > On Dec 23, 2011, at 15:37, Thomas Smith wrote: > > It's not a problem destroying the tickets, I never do that anyway--I was >