[OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.7.4 Windows and settings discrepancy

2012-01-26 Thread Lars Schimmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I had a small difference in settings of OpenAFS today (beside file corruptions): If I choose on windows 7 enterprise x64 OpenAFS 1.7.4 the "AFS client configuration" from system control panel and enter a size of 498000 kb for cache size in the Ad

[OpenAFS] files does not show the same content

2012-01-26 Thread Lars Schimmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Our users do experience some problems with files content in our cell. Mostly on Windows x64 1.7.4 clients the content of the file is not the same as on other machines. e.g. a text file edited on one windows machine with a 1.5.x client, safe to ou

Re: [OpenAFS] Timeouts and odd behavior with 1.6.0 file servers

2012-01-26 Thread Jeff White
Russ, can you link me to some more information on the data corruption issue with 1.6.0? Jeff White - Linux/Unix Systems Engineer University of Pittsburgh - CSSD On 01/25/2012 05:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: Jack Neely writes: We are working our way through a migration from old Sun AFS hardwa

Re: [OpenAFS] Timeouts and odd behavior with 1.6.0 file servers

2012-01-26 Thread Stephen Roseman
On 1/25/2012 5:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: Don't use the 1.6.0 file server. It has a data corruption problem when you have an inode clone (such as a backup volume or a migration clone) and directories are moved with mv. These are fixed in 1.6.1pre1 and in the Debian 1.6.0-3 packages. This may be

[OpenAFS] Re: Timeouts and odd behavior with 1.6.0 file servers

2012-01-26 Thread Andrew Deason
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:35:10 -0500 Jeff White wrote: > Russ, can you link me to some more information on the data corruption > issue with 1.6.0? There are 3 issues, but one is way more serious than the other two. There is a race introduced with the positional i/o feature that can cause the file

[OpenAFS] Re: Timeouts and odd behavior with 1.6.0 file servers

2012-01-26 Thread Andrew Deason
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:17:13 -0500 Stephen Roseman wrote: > 2) Should I replace only fileserver, fileserver & salvage*, or the > entire server directory? You should really try to keep these binaries at the same version as much as possible. But the specific issues being mentioned would be f

Re: [OpenAFS] Timeouts and odd behavior with 1.6.0 file servers

2012-01-26 Thread Derrick Brashear
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Jeff White wrote: > Russ, can you link me to some more information on the data corruption issue > with 1.6.0? Effectively, there's an issue where files can end up corrupted when a copy-on-write copy is modified. (a backup or readonly copy being present on the read

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.7.4 Windows and settings discrepancy

2012-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Altman
The size you specify in the registry is the amount of data you want to cache. It is not the size of the cache file which also includes all of the cell, volume, status objects, data buffer meta data. On 1/26/2012 5:32 AM, Lars Schimmer wrote: > Hi! > > I had a small difference in settings of Open

Re: [OpenAFS] files does not show the same content

2012-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Known problem. Hugh Caldwell of USGS started a thread on this subject the first week of January. Potential fixes are in the repository. When I've fixed all of the things that are necessary for 1.7.5 it will be released. On 1/26/2012 5:40 AM, Lars Schimmer wrote: > Hi! > > Our users do experie

Re: [OpenAFS] Krb auth working but unable to acquire token on any clients

2012-01-26 Thread Thomas Smith
On Jan 23, 2012, at 2:41 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > On 1/23/2012 12:57 AM, Thomas Smith wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am getting the following errors when attempting to get a token from our >> AFS server: >> >>aklog: Couldn't get domain.tld AFS tickets: >>aklog: unknown RPC error (-1765328370)

Re: [OpenAFS] Timeouts and odd behavior with 1.6.0 file servers

2012-01-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Stephen Roseman writes: > I have some 1.6.0 fileservers and now I'm scared... > 1) Is something "newer" going to be released "soon"? Or should I use > 1.6.1pre1? 1.6.1pre2 is forthcoming fairly soon, but 1.6.1 final probably has to wait for a final resolution to idledead, which appears

[OpenAFS] Heimdal & OpenAFS 1.7.4: Difficult user experience

2012-01-26 Thread John Tang Boyland
As readers to this list know; I teach a class with 40-50 students every semester which uses AFS and I have 30+ people trying to install OpenAFS on their laptops. This exposes many usability problems with the installation process. I'm pleased with the quality of the software once it starts working

Re: [OpenAFS] Heimdal & OpenAFS 1.7.4: Difficult user experience

2012-01-26 Thread Dave Botsch
I don't know if there's a way to make a "meta-msi" that would wrap up and install all the sub packages. But, you can certainly use transforms to customize each of the MSIs with the default options needed, including a correct krb5.conf, so that users just double click, install, reboot, done. On Th

Re: [OpenAFS] Heimdal & OpenAFS 1.7.4: Difficult user experience

2012-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 1/26/2012 2:37 PM, Dave Botsch wrote: > I don't know if there's a way to make a "meta-msi" that would wrap up > and install all the sub packages. > > But, you can certainly use transforms to customize each of the MSIs with > the default options needed, including a correct krb5.conf, so that use

[OpenAFS] Re: Heimdal & OpenAFS 1.7.4: Difficult user experience

2012-01-26 Thread Andrew Deason
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:26:28 -0600 John Tang Boyland wrote: > (3) If we're stuck with (1) and can't do (2), would anyone like me to > write up the installation sequence required on the Wiki? And maybe > the download page could point to it so poor lusers could find it? > And maybe for

Re: [OpenAFS] Heimdal & OpenAFS 1.7.4: Difficult user experience

2012-01-26 Thread Lars Schimmer
Hi! First: We did make a wiki page with all the needed software (links), screenshots, values to enter, path,... for our users. In case they want the software, we give them th elink to the wiki page and 99% of users could do it as we has written it down. But we do use OpenAFS 1.7.4 and still MI

Re: [OpenAFS] Timeouts and odd behavior with 1.6.0 file servers

2012-01-26 Thread Jack Neely
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:22:26PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Jack Neely writes: > > > We are working our way through a migration from old Sun AFS hardware > > running Openafs 1.4.11 to HP Blades running RHEL 6 with OpenAFS 1.6.0. > > At this point we've completed most of our file servers. > >

[OpenAFS] uss command deprecated

2012-01-26 Thread Dan Scott
Hi, The manpage for uss mentions that it is deprecated because it is designed for use with the obsolete authentication server. We use uss with a template file during account creation, to create a volume and mountpoint, and to configure a skeleton directory and to set permissions. Is the uss comm

Re: [OpenAFS] uss command deprecated

2012-01-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Dan Scott writes: > We use uss with a template file during account creation, to create a > volume and mountpoint, and to configure a skeleton directory and to set > permissions. > Is the uss command going to be removed? If so, is there an alternative > method of using similar templates? I couldn

[OpenAFS] Re: Heimdal & OpenAFS 1.7.4: Difficult user experience

2012-01-26 Thread Steve Devine
Oddly enough I just wrote this today (http://msu.edu/service/afs/AFS-tutorial-Windows7.pdf) . If its of any value to anyone let me know and I'll see if I can make it more generic. Should work if you change the references to MSU.EDU. I did not need to install the Network Manager software BTW.

Re: [OpenAFS] uss command deprecated

2012-01-26 Thread Dan Scott
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 20:26, Russ Allbery wrote: > Dan Scott writes: > >> We use uss with a template file during account creation, to create a >> volume and mountpoint, and to configure a skeleton directory and to set >> permissions. > >> Is the uss command going to be removed? If so, is there