Re: [OpenAFS] performance and udp buffers

2012-11-19 Thread Dan Van Der Ster
On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > On 9 Oct 2012, at 10:24, Dan Van Der Ster wrote: >> We currently run fileservers with udpsize=2MB, and at that size we have a 30 >> client limit in our test environment. With a buffer size=8MB (increased >> kernel max with sysctl and fi

Re: [OpenAFS] performance and udp buffers

2012-11-19 Thread Simon Wilkinson
On 19 Nov 2012, at 07:15, Jakub Moscicki wrote: > Thanks for this analysis. The increased UDP works pretty well for us at CERN > so far - albeit one limit gone other limits appear more pronounced. I'm interested in what other limits you are hitting. I'm very aware of the problems with the liste

Re: [OpenAFS] performance and udp buffers

2012-11-19 Thread Simon Wilkinson
On 19 Nov 2012, at 08:13, Dan Van Der Ster wrote: > So, the key sysctl to set to enable large receive buffers is > net.core.rmem_max. This should actually be the only thing that you need to change. The transmit queue length shouldn't matter, as the kernel is _much_ more efficient at putting U