I am trying to get Openafs 1.7.21 working on a Windows 7 machine. I followed
the directions on http://wiki.openafs.org/WindowsEndUserQuickStartGuide/
and installed Heimdall and the Network Identity Manager from the links on that
page.
Using the Identity Manager, I am able to get a Kerberos
Upgrading your AFS principal from afs@ to afs/math.cornell.edu@ will
fix this problem
and shorten the time it takes all AFS clients to obtain afs tokens.
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:50:03 AM, Steve Gaarder wrote:
I am trying to get Openafs 1.7.21 working on a Windows 7 machine. I
followed
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:04:55 +
p...@afs.list.sabi.co.uk (Peter Grandi) wrote:
* Can OpenAFS partitions be larger than 2TiB? It seems they
can be.
Yes.
* Are the limits above (31 bits) expressed in bytes or blocks
(of what size)?
kilobytes (2^10 bytes).
* Does the bug
I have in the past promoted JP Software's Take Command as an alternative
command line shell for Windows users. As far as I am aware it is the
only OpenAFS aware command shell. There are many benefits for OpenAFS
users:
1. It permits UNC paths to be the current directory so drive letter
mappings
Hi Brandon and others,
I am by no means an administrator, rather a UX designer building a concept
design as easy as possible for the end users. So, I take it, it is
possible to build an afs client without static pointers to afs servers. I
hope this applies to the home cell as well, since the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:16 PM, jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
I am by no means an administrator, rather a UX designer building a concept
design as easy as possible for the end users. So, I take it, it is
possible to build an afs client without static pointers to afs servers. I
hope
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Upgrading your AFS principal from afs@ to afs/math.cornell.edu@ will
fix this problem
and shorten the time it takes all AFS clients to obtain afs tokens.
Thanks. My next question is: if I do this, will it break existing sessions
using tokens obtained
Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com writes:
This is what SRV records are for, yes. Ideally, the CellServDB on
clients is for legacy use with old cells that don't have SRV records in
place (and to some extent is probably part of don't make IBM unhappy).
The server CellServDB is a different
On 11 Dec 2012, at 21:29, Brandon Allbery wrote:
This is what SRV records are for, yes. Ideally, the CellServDB on clients is
for legacy use with old cells
Sadly, there are loads of situations where the client CellServDB is vital.
There are far too many SOHO broadband routers that come
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Simon Wilkinson
simonxwilkin...@gmail.comwrote:
On 11 Dec 2012, at 21:29, Brandon Allbery wrote:
This is what SRV records are for, yes. Ideally, the CellServDB on
clients is for legacy use with old cells
Sadly, there are loads of situations where the client
I have seen this kind of bug in so many forms for years, decades.
Where a GUI is dependent on a file or network request and will freeze
with no feedback as to what is happening.
Really a program should be able to have a new process or *something*
to make the file or network actions without
Thanks. My next question is: if I do this, will it break existing
sessions using tokens obtained via afs@?
If you merge a new secret into the AFS key file on the server with a
new (high, say 10001) kvno, it should not. I have not tested this
though.
1. Create
On 12/11/2012 4:54 PM, Jago Pearce wrote:
I have seen this kind of bug in so many forms for years, decades.
Where a GUI is dependent on a file or network request and will freeze
with no feedback as to what is happening.
On the flip side you look at other protocols such as SMB which have a
It has been brought to my attention that at least one major anti-virus
vendor's product simply does not scan the contents of \\AFS when used in
conjunction with the AFS redirector. I have notified the vendor and I
am awaiting a response before I make their name and product version
public.
On 12/11/2012 4:30 PM, Steve Gaarder wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Upgrading your AFS principal from afs@ to afs/math.cornell.edu@ will
fix this problem
and shorten the time it takes all AFS clients to obtain afs tokens.
Thanks. My next question is: if I do this, will
* Harald Barth [2012-12-11 23:07:07 +0100]:
Thanks. My next question is: if I do this, will it break existing
sessions using tokens obtained via afs@?
If you merge a new secret into the AFS key file on the server with a
new (high, say 10001) kvno, it should not. I have not tested this
16 matches
Mail list logo
