On 10/13/2020 3:05 PM, Giovanni Bracco (giovanni.bra...@enea.it) wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestion, but I have tried to use the command
>
> fs setcrypt -crypt off
>
> on 1.8.x clients
>
> and
>
> fs setcrypt -crypt
>
> on 1.6.x clients
>
> without any effect on performance in both cases,
Yes, of course, I really meant that the way OpenAFS client provides
encryption is really "spectacularly bad", as you wrote!
Giovanni
On 13/10/20 21:33, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 09:26:43PM +0200, Giovanni Bracco wrote:
Sorry for the typing mistake in previous mail, but
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 09:26:43PM +0200, Giovanni Bracco wrote:
> Sorry for the typing mistake in previous mail, but you got the point!
>
> Now with the proper setting at the client startup the result is clear,
> the low performance was indeed due to encryption on!
>
> Thank you, the case is
Sorry for the typing mistake in previous mail, but you got the point!
Now with the proper setting at the client startup the result is clear,
the low performance was indeed due to encryption on!
Thank you, the case is solved but it is indeed impressive that
encrypting the data transfer
Hi Giovanni,
What you write is generally correct or close to correct, but some details
differ and I don't know if they are artifacts of your email or reflect your
actual testing.
`fs setcrypt -crypt on` and `fs setcrypt -crypt off` are indeed the ways to
configure the (non-)use of encryption for
Thank you for the suggestion, but I have tried to use the command
fs setcrypt -crypt off
on 1.8.x clients
and
fs setcrypt -crypt
on 1.6.x clients
without any effect on performance in both cases, no increase for 1.8.x
and no decrease for 1.6.x
Is that the way to control the encryption,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 09:42:14AM -0400, Jeffrey E Altman wrote:
> On 10/13/2020 9:28 AM, Giovanni Bracco (giovanni.bra...@enea.it) wrote:
> > I have seen that the first release of OpenAFS 1.9.0 is out and so I
> > thought that it was time to try at least 1.8.x and also 1.9 on our
> > production
On 10/13/2020 9:28 AM, Giovanni Bracco (giovanni.bra...@enea.it) wrote:
> I have seen that the first release of OpenAFS 1.9.0 is out and so I
> thought that it was time to try at least 1.8.x and also 1.9 on our
> production Linux x86-64 nodes, where we have used 1.6.x up to now.
>
> Our AFS cell
I have seen that the first release of OpenAFS 1.9.0 is out and so I
thought that it was time to try at least 1.8.x and also 1.9 on our
production Linux x86-64 nodes, where we have used 1.6.x up to now.
Our AFS cell has file servers with OpenAFS 1.6.x and while over WAN the
performance can be
