[OpenAFS] Re: 1.4.11 and RHEL3: No [AOP_]WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 05:05:45PM -0500, Andrew Deason wrote: > > 1.4.11 on RHEL3 bails out due to no [AOP_]WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE being > > available: > > 2.4 kernel, right? I believe you want > . Yes, 2.4 kernel, thanks for the pa

[OpenAFS] 1.4.11 and RHEL3: No [AOP_]WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE

Hi, 1.4.11 on RHEL3 bails out due to no [AOP_]WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE being available: @@ -1658,7 +1680,12 @@ do_it: status = afs_linux_writepage_sync(inode, pp, 0, offset); SetPageUptodate(pp); -UnlockPage(pp); +#if defined(WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) +if ( status != WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE )

[OpenAFS] Re: Fedora 10 kernels: openafs-1.4.8/src/afs/afs.h:161: error: field 'Fid' has incomplete type

Hi, On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:18:00AM +, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > On 1 Feb 2009, at 09:26, Axel Thimm wrote: >> I wish Fedora would keep the last kernel-devel around > > OpenAFS has a repository of every kernel-devel module that Fedora/RedHat > has released for all of th

[OpenAFS] Re: Fedora 10 kernels: openafs-1.4.8/src/afs/afs.h:161: error: field 'Fid' has incomplete type

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 09:53:43PM +, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > On 31 Jan 2009, at 20:05, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >Fedora 10 kernels starting with 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 fail > > > I've successfully built 1.4.8, without patches, for this kernel - >

[OpenAFS] Fedora 10 kernels: openafs-1.4.8/src/afs/afs.h:161: error: field 'Fid' has incomplete type

Hi, Fedora 10 kernels starting with 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 fail with CC [M] /builddir/openafs-1.4.8/src/libafs/MODLOAD-2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64-Default/afs_analyze.o In file included from /builddir/openafs-1.4.8/src/afs/afsincludes.h:44, from /builddir/openafs-1.

[OpenAFS] Re: libafs: Unknown symbol init_pid_ns

On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 02:39:24PM -0500, Marc Dionne wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: >> Thanks for the hint, but it seems to just call make prepare and make >> scripts. The documentation says: >> >> --- 2.4 Preparing the kernel tree for module build >> >>

[OpenAFS] Re: libafs: Unknown symbol init_pid_ns

Hi, On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:44:41PM -0500, Jason Edgecombe wrote: >> So actually this means that the error is a followup from the warning >> about a missing Module.symvers. :( >> >> Is there any way to create Module.symvers w/o building the whole >> kernel and its modules? Probably not. :( :( :

[OpenAFS] Re: libafs: Unknown symbol init_pid_ns

On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 10:24:59AM -0500, Marc Dionne wrote: >>> configure:6856: result: yes >>> configure:6859: checking if find_task_by_pid is usable >>> make -C /srv/atrpms.net/atrpms/kernelsrc/f9-x86_64/2.6.26.6-79.fc9-x86_64 >>> M=/builddir/openafs-1.4.7/conftest.dir modules KBUILD_VERBOSE=1

[OpenAFS] Re: libafs: Unknown symbol init_pid_ns

Hi, On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 08:04:05AM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote: > > Yes, the patch is in, and Angel's builds are OK as well. It just fails > > the configure test: > > > > checking if find_task_by_pid is usable... yes > > > > I think the check looks under /usr/include instead of the kernel >

[OpenAFS] Re: libafs: Unknown symbol init_pid_ns

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 06:41:27PM +0100, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > On 19 Sep 2008, at 18:30, Marc Dionne wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Angel Marin patched up ATrpms&

[OpenAFS] libafs: Unknown symbol init_pid_ns

Hi, Angel Marin patched up ATrpms' package to support 2.6.26 with the STABLE14-linux-2626-support-20080608.patch. While the package builds fine, modprobing libafs gives an unknown symbol init_pid_ns. http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1450 This does not happen in Angel's local build, whi

[OpenAFS] Re: Fedora repo?

Hi, On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:50:59PM +0200, Bjorge Solli wrote: > Hi all. Looking into OpenAFS for a large scale university setup (500+) > with Fedora (8 at the moment). > > Is there any publically available and reliable repos with openafs rpms? > > Simon Wilkinson mentioned one existed, but I

[OpenAFS] Re: kmod-openafs versioning on RHEL5

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 03:15:33PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote: > > >>> YHO doesn't help that he's trying to use an older minor > > >>> revision of the RPMs he's using with a newer minor revision > > >>> of modules; The kernel version is entirely irrelevant. > > >>> > > >>> foo-1-(`uname -r`

[OpenAFS] Re: kmod-openafs versioning on RHEL5

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:44:26AM +, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > On 16 Mar 2008, at 09:02, Axel Thimm wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 08:01:46PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>

[OpenAFS] Re: atrpms for fedora openafs?

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 03:29:40PM -0400, Marc Dionne wrote: > Le 15/03/08 01:51 PM, Simon Wilkinson a écrit : >> On 15 Mar 2008, at 17:28, Axel Thimm wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the info & patch selection. I'll add the patches to ATrpms' >>> pa

[OpenAFS] Re: kmod-openafs versioning on RHEL5

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 08:01:46PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:49:48PM -0800, Darren Patterson wrote: > > > After building new kmod packages for the latest R

[OpenAFS] Re: kmod-openafs versioning on RHEL5

On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:49:48PM -0800, Darren Patterson wrote: > After building new kmod packages for the latest RHEL5 kernel I discovered > that rpm is very unhappy with the naming convention. Yum refuses to > install the package claiming that kmod-openafs-1.4.5-2.2.6.18_53.1.4.el5 is > new

[OpenAFS] Re: atrpms for fedora openafs?

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:48:42PM +, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > On 13 Mar 2008, at 22:39, William Murray wrote: > >> I have noticed a lack of kmdl rpms for Fedora 8 in >> the atrpms repo. I have openafs-kmdl-2.6.23.15-137.fc8-1.4.6-26.fc8 >> but see nothing for kernel 2.6.24 > > OpenAFS 1.

[OpenAFS] Re: In the RPM spec file, what is the goal of the special fedora option?

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:07:34PM -0500, Derrick Brashear wrote: > On Feb 12, 2008 9:01 PM, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2008 4:03 PM, Derrick Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 12, 2008 4:58 PM, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've been buil

[OpenAFS] Re: afs rpm architecture problem

Hi, On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:03:54PM +, William John Murray wrote: > >Hello Axel, >I have a problem with my laptop openafs-client package. > Using the lastest fedora 8 kernel I get: > > Jan 7 09:10:59 BillMurray kernel: libafs: version magic > '2.6.23.9-85.fc8 SMP mod_unlo

[OpenAFS] Re: issue with Fedora 8 and retaining tokens after graphical login

On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 08:19:38PM -0500, Derrick Brashear wrote: > > And any openafs acceptance into any Linux distribution has better > > cards to be FHS than not. If openafs ever makes it into > > RHEL/Fedora proper it will have to be FHS style. > > If there's a chance of that, fine, but otherw

[OpenAFS] Re: issue with Fedora 8 and retaining tokens after graphical login

Hi, On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 07:29:23PM +, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > There's a couple of problems. Some new upstream kernel releases > contain changes which break OpenAFS - these changes are some times > backported into "earlier" Fedora releases, so a lack of change in > kernel version doesn't a

[OpenAFS] Re: rpmbuild

On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 03:52:24PM +0100, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > On 1 Oct 2007, at 15:45, Peter Metcalf wrote: > > >I have over the past several updates to the kernel failed at > >building a new module for AFS. > >Using: rpmbuild --rebuild --target=i686 openafs.src.rpm > >My error I get: >

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS and RHEL5 Server 64-bit?

On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:03:20AM +0100, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > On 7 Aug 2007, at 23:51, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >I wouldn't mind if someone adds a build time switch to leave that > >choice to the concerned user, e.g. something like > > > >rpmbuild --re

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS and RHEL5 Server 64-bit?

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:53:47PM -0400, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:37:43PM -0400, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > >>On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > >> > >>>>http:/

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS and RHEL5 Server 64-bit?

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:31:32PM -0400, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:02:17PM -0400, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > >>I have some dual-boot XP/CentOS 5 systems that I want to authenticate to a > >>server runnin

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS and RHEL5 Server 64-bit?

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:37:43PM -0400, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > >>http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/openafs/ > >> > >>It contains support for all RHEL5/CentOS5 kernels ever released. > > > >It's worth noting that there are significant differences betwe

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS and RHEL5 Server 64-bit?

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:02:17PM -0400, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I have some dual-boot XP/CentOS 5 systems that I want to authenticate to a > server running RHEL 5 Server 64-bit edition, unpatched. I want central > authentication from the server, so the same home directory will appear for > an

[OpenAFS] Re: Openafs 1.4.4 build fails on Fedora 7

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:53:22PM -0400, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >>The SRPM is the same as the one you extracted those patches from. > >> > >>I suspect you're probably not fully regenerating configure in orde

[OpenAFS] Re: Openafs 1.4.4 build fails on Fedora 7

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 03:36:01PM +0100, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > On 31 Jul 2007, at 13:39, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:50:11PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote: > >> On 7/23/07, Bruce Orchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>

[OpenAFS] Re: Openafs 1.4.4 build fails on Fedora 7

Hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:50:11PM -0400, Derrick Brashear wrote: > On 7/23/07, Bruce Orchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >In the last few days, kernel 2.6.22 was released as an update for Fedora > >7. A build from source of Openafs 1.4.4 fails with the following message: > > > We's di

[OpenAFS] Re: RPM packaging suggestion

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:38:17PM -0500, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 4/25/07, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 06:56:32PM -0500, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> I've noticed that when the yum update runs, it replaces the > >> o

[OpenAFS] Re: RPM packaging suggestion

On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 06:56:32PM -0500, Paul Johnson wrote: > I've noticed that when the yum update runs, it replaces the > openafs-kernel module, rather than just installing the new one. > That's bad if I end up not keeping the new kernel. Other kernel module > RPMS leave the old versions. > >

[OpenAFS] Re: Compiling openafs 1.4.2 on RHEL5

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:29:01AM -0400, Marsh, Alexander wrote: > I am attempting to compile openafs 1.4.2 on RHEL 5 as a client machine. > I realize not to many people have attempted to install openafs on RHEL5 > as it has been out less than a week, but I would greatly appreciate any > help or

[OpenAFS] Re: FC7?

Hi, On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:38:01AM +, William John Murray wrote: > Hi Axel, > I am using FC7T2, and there is as yet no AFS RPM. The latest > snap code compiles well enough to us, (but has a directory issue) Do > you expect to make rpms before the final release? > Tha

[OpenAFS] Re: Fedora Core 5, openafs 1.4.2, rebuildin kernel-module

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:39:37PM +0100, Alexander Al wrote: > I've got a server running FC 5 with kernelmodule 1.4.1 > > Yum has upgraded the kernel towards Linux servername > 2.6.19-1.2288.2.1.fc5smp #1 SMP Thu Feb 22 11:13:11 EST 2007 i686 i686 > i386 GNU/Linux > > but we can't figure it out

[OpenAFS] Re: building openafs kernelmodule on FC5

On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 06:37:06PM -0500, Ron Croonenberg wrote: > > I am trying to build the kernel module for openafs-1.4.2, but it seems > to break. (linux/config.h doesn't seem to exist ??) Just comment the includes or get ready to use rpms at ATrpms.net. > That probably means I am missing s

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS on FC6

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:03:23PM -0500, Ron Croonenberg wrote: > > Hello all, > > Did anyone try to compile OpenAFS for FC6 ? > (I tried to compile the openafs-1.4.2-src.tar dist) There are 1.4.2 packages here: http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/openafs/ > What I get is: > /usr/local/src/openafs-1.4

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS 1.4.2 on latest FC5 kernel

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:56:02PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Note I say "should" On x86_64, the "fs" program SEGV's: > > > > + fs setacl /afs system:anyuser rl > > fs:'/afs'/tmp/do-afs-admin-9629.sh: line 6: 9802 Segmentation fault >

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS 1.4.2 on latest FC5 kernel

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:37:29AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Which files do you miss or see relocated? > > > >Well, the binaries from /usr/afs/bin/

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS 1.4.2 on latest FC5 kernel

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:04:17PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Have you tried the binary packages? > > I overlooked the x86_64 kernel module the first time I looked through the > webpage and thought there weren't any. I've since downloaded the binary > packages and installed them. OK. > Nex

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS 1.4.2 on latest FC5 kernel

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:40:16PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There are packages for 2200 at http://atrpms.net/dist/fc5/openafs/ > > I tried downloading and building your SRPM, but I get this error: > > altair#r

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS 1.4.2 on latest FC5 kernel

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:45:25PM +0200, Ingemar Nilsson wrote: > Matthew Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Building the openafs kernel module on the latest FC5 kernels fails. > > I am rebuilding the FC5 rpms for the 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 kernel and see > > the following build failure > > ch

[OpenAFS] Re: Openafs on RHEL5b1

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 07:17:03PM -0400, Jason Edgecombe wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just rebuilt and installed the openafs 1.4.2 rpms on RHEL5 beta 1.. > The RHEL4 RPMs complained about the wrond version of libc. Can you give the packages at http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/openafs/ a try? > I'm ple

[OpenAFS] OT: on the necessity of following vendor updating policy (was: testing RPMs for 1.4.2)

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:01:30PM -0400, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >o If you want to run Fedora Core, you need to keep up with the pace of > > it. If you cannot there are RHEL and clones and other enterprise > > Actuall

[OpenAFS] Re: testing RPMs for 1.4.2

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:29:08PM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > On Friday, October 13, 2006 09:18:24 PM +0200 Axel Thimm > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >But please do simply upgrade your kernel package. It is important for > >the security of your system and wi

[OpenAFS] Re: testing RPMs for 1.4.2

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:59:12PM -0400, Ron Croonenberg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:52:34PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > You'll also need to deposit the kmdl macros under /etc/rpm/macros > > which you can find under atrpms-devel or simple googling, > > e.g. http

[OpenAFS] Re: testing RPMs for 1.4.2

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:26:43PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:12:37PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> rpmbuild --rebuild --target=i686 openafs...src.rpm > >> > >>I'll let A

[OpenAFS] Re: testing RPMs for 1.4.2

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:12:37PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > rpmbuild --rebuild --target=i686 openafs...src.rpm > > I'll let Axel try to explain to you why his method has to be so much > more complicated than that. ;) Who says it is? You need a working kernel build environment for the kernel

[OpenAFS] Re: testing RPMs for 1.4.2

it would be far less pain for yourself to update 2054 to a more recent release. Also consider the security implications of running network services like openafs on kernels with known security issues. > I am trying to install the client on FC5 smp x86_64 > > thanks, > > Ron >

[OpenAFS] testing RPMs for 1.4.2 (was: OpenAFS RPMs at ATrpms)

I have placed packages of 1.4.2fc4 in atrpms-testing. The supported platforms have been extended to Fedora Core 3 i386 and x86_64 Fedora Core 4 i386 and x86_64 Fedora Core 5 i386, x86_64 and ppc Fedora Core 6 i386, x86_64 and ppc Redhat Enterprise Linux 3 i386 and x86_64 Redhat Enterpr

[OpenAFS] Re: OpenAFS on FC5 x86-64

On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:42:47PM -0400, Ron Croonenberg wrote: > Is there a set of rpm's available to install the OpenAFS client on FC5 > x86-64 ? Or do I have to compile that myself ? Yes, use the packages at http://atrpms.net/dist/fc5/openafs/ -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpo9bMSvfb32.pgp