I'm setting up a new cell, and I think I've run into something that is
either a bug or a piece of documentation that needs to be clarified
(at http://www.openafs.org/pages/doc/QuickStartUnix/auqbg005.htm#HDRWQ80
steps 5-8)
The behavior is that after creating read-only replicas of root.cell
and ro
Could someone comment on the state of the OpenAFS NFS Translator code?
The last email I found on it [1] seems to suggest that it should work
on Solaris 9, but when I try to use knfs on that platform (Solaris 9,
sparcv9 64-bit, OpenAFS 1.4.1), I get:
# knfs -host hostname -id 150522
knfs: failed t
arrow's Musings
http://www.usenix.org/publications/login/2005-02/pdfs/musings.pdf
Thanks,
--
Daniel Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
and then backup the dumps
as normal files. Or a TiBS server (but that will never actually
happen.)
--
Daniel Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
an even more compelling argument for AFS over NFS or other large
filesystems is the way you can e
On 8/2/06, Skylar Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel Clark wrote:
> I'm putting together a "NFSv3 is disgustingly insecure, we should move
> to OpenAFS" type presentation for my management [1]. I've found
> explanations to be less than completely u
, which in theory is supposed to have one of the/the
best NFS implementations available. All of the real problems are
client-side.
--
Daniel Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
There is some doc up at
http://www.dementia.org/twiki/bin/view/AFSLore/KerberosV ; I do
remember seeing a step by step guide at some point; googling might
find it.
AFAIK there is no real tie in between OpenAFS/KerberosV and LDAP - AFS
keeps track of its own groups and other directory information
On 9/27/06, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What methods / utility's are others using to keep machines configuration
> files current?
There are about as many different methods as there are sites. Stanford is
currently in the process of deployin
On 10/10/06, Joseph Kulisics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If there's a performance tuning guide, a FAQ, or a message thread on the
subject, please, let me know. I looked around the web a lot, but I didn't
find any guide. (Maybe I just haven't found the right search words.)
There was something on
On 10/16/06, Dan Pritts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks -
what's the current status of using samba to serve files from an
AFS backend to windows clients?
There is a (hopefully pretty complete) list of methods of doing this up at:
* http://www.dementia.org/twiki/bin/view/AFSLore/SMBtoAF
On 10/17/06, Kevin Scott Sumner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With just some configuration changes, the kdc authentication, token-gettingand ticket-getting all worked out of the box once-upon a time... although,we now have compiled our own version of ssh/sshd.
This seems sort of unavoidable if you wan
On 10/25/06, Bastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christopher D. Clausen schreef:
> Bastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think it is a hardware problem, since other file transfers (in
this case scp) have normal speed.
Before I knew non-afs transfers were normal, I tried different ports
though
On 10/27/06, Leggett, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Sorry if these are covered somewhere, but my Architecture team is
having issues with my proposal to evaluate AFS as part of an
Environmental Segregation project. We have an issue where we have four
distinct environments, that are basicall
On 10/27/06, Leggett, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does AFS compare to its stateless communication with NFS? We have
had problems with vendors using NFS to maintain links (EMC comes to
mind) to storage arrays, that fail often and hard.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "using NFS to m
On 10/31/06, Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday, October 29, 2006 09:42:37 AM -0500 Jim Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At one time we were trying to get afsd to auto-tune so that the various
> options for different cache sizes would not be needed. If the current
> auto-
that uses their own code (see [5] sections III and IV) instead
of PSR.
[1] http://www.openpbs.org/
[2] http://www.lam-mpi.org/software/psr/
[3] http://web.mit.edu/longjobs/www/
[4] http://mit.edu/longjobs-dev/notebook/
[5] http://web.mit.edu/longjobs-dev/doc/netsec.txt
--
Daniel Clark # Sys Admin
16 matches
Mail list logo
