Re: [OpenAFS] Implicit privilege to do "fs setacl" in a directory

Derrick J Brashear wrote: On the other hand, we found out that one can apply "fs sa" on a directory, even if he is not in the ACL table, and even if he is not the directory's owner, but if he is the owner of the mounting point of the volume where the directory resides. The latter behavior was a

[OpenAFS] Implicit privilege to do "fs setacl" in a directory

lege on the directory. On the other hand, we found out that one can apply "fs sa" on a directory, even if he is not in the ACL table, and even if he is not the directory's owner, but if he is the owner of the mounting point of the volume where the directory resides. Is it a feature

[OpenAFS] DB servers: simultaneous use of 2 OpenAFS versions

). Once upon a time, AFS documentation said that all DB servers must run the same AFS version, and so that they should be upgraded in the shortest lapse of time. Is this still true? Is the above 10 days cohabitation possible, or what are the problems likely to arise? Thanks for your help, Frederic

[OpenAFS] Inode file server on Linux?

this, so maybe I am wrong? So, is it possible to use the inode file server with Linux/ext2, and if so how can I activate it? Thanks, Frederic Gilbert. ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/op

[OpenAFS] Servers from Transarc-AFS to OpenAFS.

Transarc format to OpenAFS format. Sorry if this is a beginner's FAQ; I did not find any mention about such conversion in all that I could read (except the use of vldb_convert for some old Transarc versions), but I wanted to be really sure before doing the move... Thanks for your help, Fre