Re: [OpenAFS] Kindle Editions of OpenAFS documentation

2011-06-01 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
I can confirm that the Kindle cannot read ePub, but .mobi files work just fine. the Adobe Editions ePub files tend to be DRM'd, although also don't require DRM to be used. If we're talking about kindle-specific options, .mobi is probably best. If we're looking for an "ereader format" that'll span

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: High Available Transparent Shared-Disk

2011-04-11 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Andrew Deason wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 03:45:54 -0700 (PDT) > a a wrote: > > > Hi All, > > Please don't multipost. > > > We are searching around a solution like a "high available transparent > > file system" that makes the fault transparent to the application

[OpenAFS] (no subject)

2010-05-19 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker

Re: [OpenAFS] Why only UDP for RX?

2009-12-28 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
My understanding is that the choice to use UDP was something that was inherited from before OpenAFS (that is, prior to the code being dropped by IBM). If you look at Derrick's reply to the email you linked, he says there was a branch in CVS. I believe there is still a "plan" to make the switch to

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS on the Palm Pre smartphone!

2009-12-14 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
Part of the issue with Android and WebOS is that neither is designed to be a "file manager" type OS. They're both designed around the concept that the application will know where the files it needs are. What this means is that neither has an out of the box file manager as part of the OS. I know an

Re: [OpenAFS] GSoC Server priorities

2009-10-15 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Lars Schimmer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi! > > I've seen the code for server priorities made in a GSoC is in the > private windows test builds. > > As it could solve one smaller design problem for us, one question is open: > On w

Re: [OpenAFS] AFS to NFS translator in Linux

2009-02-10 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Troy Telford wrote: > Where can I find some information on how to use the AFS->NFS translator on > Linux? (Does it even exist?) I think Daniel is right, in that it's either strenuously recommended against using the NFS translator, or it's completely non-function

Re: [OpenAFS] Read-Write Disconnected Mode - How does it work?

2009-01-31 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
As far as I know, this is a fairly new feature. As for stability, I'm not sure how you define 'stable' but seeing as how it's pretty new, I'm not sure anyone is considering it stable. The command is 'fs discon', and I'm not sure on the level of documentation available, but I think there is some. T

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Deadline- Jan 9! CFP: 2009 OpenAFS & Kerberos Best Practices Workshop

2009-01-06 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
#s 2 and 5 intrigue me, 5 more so, but 2 seems interesting. On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Steven Jenkins wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Esther Filderman > wrote: > > This is a reminder that the Call for Participation for the 2009 > > OpenAFS & Kerberos Best Practices Workshop will en

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS.org web site design project

2008-11-11 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
Hi all, The synopsis of Monday's meeting in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] room has been uploaded to the AFSLore wiki, at http://www.dementia.org/twiki/bin/view/AFSLore/OpenAFSWebsiteProjectPagePlease provide any feedback you have via either the wiki, or the jabber conference room. I would like to make th

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS TAC

2008-11-04 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
> Speaking again for myself only, I think such a thing where > organizations likely to join the foundation as sponsor and non-sponsor > members get seated (as do community members) until the foundation > exists and we formally compose the TAC based on actual eligibility is > somewhat desirable. >

Re: [OpenAFS] Foundation Plan redux

2008-10-27 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
> In this case, as with AFS standardisation, I strongly disagree that term > limits are desirable. At their worst, they just ensure the retirement of > strong post holders, and their replacement with inexperienced ones. > > OpenAFS badly needs a way of encouraging new faces, and growing those > ind

Re: [OpenAFS] Google Summer of Code, conclusion for 2008

2008-09-30 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:01 AM, David R Boldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Will there be any synopsis on what was accomplished this year? I know I, at least, would be willing to answer any and all questions you might have about my specific project. I could probably try and answer questions

Re: [OpenAFS] Google Summer of Code 2008 wrapup

2008-09-15 Thread Jake Thebault-Spieker
> I encourage the > students to comment on their work and experiences. > I really really enjoyed my experience this summer, working on kAFS. Going in, I was pretty sure my skills weren't where they should be for this project, but I thought I would be able to learn. I learned an enormous amount, b