Derek Atkins wrote:
2) The default FC5 kernel doesn't work with PAGs (although this is fixed
in an update kernel that should be out soon)
Just out of curiosity, what does this mean? I've been rebuilding the
FC4 kernels to remove the Read-Only patch so PAGs will work. Is this
something
Russ Allbery wrote:
Could you try the following patch and let me know if this fixes it?
Please let me know if it does.
Works for me on AS4.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Group
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info
' is an unrecognized format
function type
I'm (finally) testing the 1.4.1 RC8 release and I'm encountering this on
Red Hat Enterprise 4AS for x86_64 platforms. Anyone have a fix yet?
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Group
___
OpenAFS-info
problem or did munge the openafs install?
The default policy on WS/ES/AS 4 breaks AFS (as well as other things).
The message about sys_close is a check for kernel taint. This message
is not caused by SELinux.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
try solutions,
but I'm not close to knowing enough about this to fix this on my own. :)
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs
Jason McCormick wrote:
After installing the new Fedora 4 kernel (2.6.14-1.1644_FC4), when you
insert the AFS module is now reports that it cannot find the syscall
table.
I did a little more researching on this over the weekend. Release 1644
of the Fedora 4 kernel bumps up to 2.6.14.3 from
suddenly FC4 is using UID-based PAGs. We're
using OpenAFAS 1.4.0. Is this a known problem?
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo
^MFailed to invalidate all pages on inode 0xef942d00 refcount 1 states 0x1
name null
^MFailed to invalidate all pages on inode 0xde636800 refcount 1 states 0x1
name null
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info
--On Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:55:02 AM -0400 chas williams - CONTRACTOR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Jason McCormick
write s:
VMware has its own kernel modules that you compile for each kernel.
Basically they provide hooks into system-level operations like
--On Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:56:51 AM -0400 Derrick J Brashear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have a box hooked up to a serial port console with a logger to try catch
another.
Thank you.
Unfortunately the oops is not helpful because it doesn't have time to print
before the kernel blows
--On Monday, July 18, 2005 10:17:32 PM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Jason McCormick
writes: before the kernel blows up. It prints the first hex address of
what looks
like a memory location and then dies hard. Looks like:
[c01bd35c]
its useful is you
-Fid.Volume != pvc-fid.Fid.Volume
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
--On Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:44:53 AM -0400 chas williams - CONTRACTOR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Jason
McCormick w rites:
moving around non-trival-sized files. I've not been able to capture an
oops yet. Also, we're seeing a lot of these in dmesg /var/log
happening for the last several releases, but we cannot make it reliably
happen all the time. It seem that moving large files from AFS to local
disk and local disk to AFS works fine.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS
the
change is to do an ls -l on the RO and RW path to force some sort of
cache update. Any ideas?
1.3.71 is old. There have been a lot of cache-consistency clean-ups since
.71 appeared. Try 1.3.82 + the patch I posted on 2005-05-03.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure
--On Tuesday, May 03, 2005 09:10:35 AM +0200 Stephan Wiesand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing this as well on an RHEL4 respin, kernel 2.6.9-5.0.5.EL:
Try the attached patch. It seems to be working for me, at least after
minimal testing. YMMV.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT
the files (on the .81 box) to include the wiped-out data, the
FC3 box running .82 still couldn't see those changes after a release. The
AS3 box again say the changes immediately.
After I get this situation stabilized, I'll try and create a test-case for
this situation.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL
with AFS. Try compiling your kernel w/o
PREEMPT.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
dang it... Here's the text file.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
# cmdebug localhost -long
Lock afs_xvcache status: (none_waiting)
Lock afs_xdcache status: (none_waiting)
Lock afs_xserver status: (none_waiting)
Lock afs_xvcb status: (none_waiting)
Lock afs_xbrs
(AFS_LINUX20_ENV)'
I tried this patch first but I get odd results:
$ klog
Password:
Unable to authenticate to AFS because a pioctl failed.
I'm going to get the SMP kernels now and rebuild for those w/o the patch.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
the SMP kernel seems to work perfectly. So it's definitely something
in the uniproc kernel. Is there any random patches floating around out
there?
Now I just need to get the AFS/KRB5 stuff to compile right.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
--On Monday, April 11, 2005 01:10:26 PM -0400 Jason McCormick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is the 'SysRq t' output from the EL4 test box. The procedure I'm
following here is:
Did you get a chance to look at this yet Derrick?
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure
discover today that other terminals remain active, so this is
blocking within the user's IO request. Let me know what you want me to do
next.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
SysRq : Show State
sibling
task PC
--On Monday, April 11, 2005 11:40:49 AM -0400 Derrick J Brashear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you get alt-sysrq t output when it locks up? Or did I ask you about
this already?
You did last week. As soon as I switch back to the test box and crash it,
I'll shoot that off to you.
--
Jason
--On Tuesday, March 08, 2005 06:37:42 PM -0500 Matthew Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 08:51:55PM -0500, Jason McCormick wrote:
At a theoretical level, I think my system would work fine. Basically the
system I'm working on has 2 SPEC files. One builds all
openafs-kernel-1.3.79-1.1.fc3.2.6.10-1.766_FC3.smp.i686.i386.rpm
Doh! Take out one of the .%{arch} segments above.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https
Atkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you handle building all the kernel modules for a set of N
kernels without requiring each binary kernel to be installed?
-derek
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure what issue you're referring to...
--On Saturday, March 05, 2005
I'm not sure what issue you're referring to...
--On Saturday, March 05, 2005 12:58:05 PM -0500 Derek Atkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you deal with the kernel module issue with 2.6 kernels?
-derek
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a working set of spec files
]PGP key available
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
problems I experience are the problems unmounting /afs and the
cache filesystem structure.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo
at 0xc034b6c0 (pattern scan)
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
on systems
with no separate /usr/vice/cache partition.
Looking great!
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
or memory, if the conditions are
CACHESIZE=AUTOMATIC cache is on /. Then at least the upgrade will
succeed (i.e. AFS starts), allowing admins to have their management systems
replace the config file with the site-specifc one.
Any thoughts about this?
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT
This error seems to have been introduced by the patch to bug # 17377. I'm
looking into the error, but thought I would report it. My build platform
is Fedora Core 3.
--
Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
-of-data test -- is
that problem supposed to be fixed?
Are you applying any of the previous patches we've been using for the
2.6.10 stuff? Zombie-workaround patch still applies cleanly.
--
Jason McCormick
CERT Infrastructure Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 412-268-7961
Are you applying any of the previous patches we've been using for the
2.6.10 stuff? Zombie-workaround patch still applies cleanly.
it probably does, but is no longer needed as of sunday's cvs.
Great! I'll have test packages for us done shortly.
--
Jason McCormick
CERT Infrastructure Team
.
-- Jason
--On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 10:06:06 PM -0500 Matthew Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 11:20:36AM -0500, Jason McCormick wrote:
Are you applying any of the previous patches we've been using for the
2.6.10 stuff? Zombie-workaround patch still applies cleanly
before as well as all disk cache issues, including
cache consistency problems?
--
Jason McCormick
CERT Infrastructure Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 412-268-7961
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo
?
--
Jason McCormick
CERT Infrastructure Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 412-268-7961
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
--On Monday, January 10, 2005 11:32:05 PM -0600 Ryan Underwood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
export sys_call_table or wait for a better patch.
Where is the issue? Who is working in this area?
Until the final version is completed, you can apply the attached patches
to support exporting
helpful?
--
Jason McCormick
CERT Infrastructure Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 412-268-7961
Dec 17 10:15:43 gti kernel: rxi_Start: xmit list overflowed1Unable to handle
kernel paging request at virtual address
Dec 17 10:15:43 gti kernel: printing eip:
Dec 17 10:15:43 gti kernel: 12fad54c
Dec 17
the file which seems long. I'm going to guess
that this is a partial victory because there's no oops...
--
Jason McCormick
CERT Infrastructure Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 412-268-7961
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https
if this is
helpful or not.
I've built 1.3.76 and will try to get to debugging some of the other
mentioned problems later this week.
Thanks.
--
Jason McCormick
CERT Infrastructure Team
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org
Note: I've changed the subject to FC3 + AFS 1.3.7x Problems to more
accurately reflect the discussion.
--On Friday, December 10, 2004 05:11:04 PM -0500 Derrick J Brashear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Jason McCormick wrote:
* Inability to unmount /usr/vice/cache
this for a little bit because I've not had time to
properly test or debug any of these. Let me know what we can do to further
debug these problems.
--
Jason McCormick
CERT Infrastructure Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** 412-268-7961
Dec 10 14:48:48 gti kernel: rxi_Start: xmit list overflowed1Unable
. I'm trying to do this in a nice and
clean way and I can't get autoconf to not set -O2, but I'm far from an
autoconf guru. Can anyone show me a way to remove that optimization?
Thanks
--
Jason McCormick
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL
. I'm trying to do this in a nice and
clean way and I can't get autoconf to not set -O2, but I'm far from an
autoconf guru. Can anyone show me a way to remove that optimization?
Thanks
--
Jason McCormick
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL
--On Wednesday, November 10, 2004 08:42:19 PM -0500 Derrick J Brashear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Jason McCormick wrote:
Does anyone know if it's possible to force what autoconf sets as an
optimization level? I've tried patching the source tree in several
locations
48 matches
Mail list logo
