>>> Would the community find it useful if I were to create Amazon Kindle
>>> Editions of the OpenAFS Documentation?
>
>> Adobe ePub versions would be helpful. That way all the common electronic
>> readers can use them, rather than use a restricted format.
>
> Except for the Kindle, which I don't
r "hoping to help others
avoid the same problem" and the number "NFS still sucks!"
nomad
Original Message
Subject:Re: Core files for 66036317
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:06:59 -0600
From: Kelley Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EM
hile
back. Hopefully with them integrated together there's no way for it to
pick up different compilers, but you never know...
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Lee Damon wrote:
Derek,
In the now successfully rebuilt 1.4.0rc5 SRPM-based RPM for x86_64
everything seems to work except for aklog
Would it be possible to get an updated SRPM from this? It looks like
there were some changes in the doc structure and the SPEC file that has
been working with rc2 doesn't work with this release.
thanks,
nomad
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
The OpenAFS Gatekeepers announce the availability of Open
Should be in ticket #23845 if I did it right.
nomad
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Lee Damon wrote:
This particular problem was caused by using the wrong compiler and has
been resolved.
However, the aklog segfault reported under 1.4.0 is still here:
The last few lines of an
ve no tokens and no afs/domain krb ticket:
: || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [5] ; tokens
Tokens held by the Cache Manager:
--End of list--
: || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [6] ; klist
Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_666_ac3476
Default principal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Valid starting Expires Service p
I grabbed the 1.4.1-rc2 src.tar and doc.tar files.
I installed the 1.4.0 src.rpm, replaced the src.tar and doc.tar files in
/usr/src/redhad/SOURCE with the 1.4.1-rc2 files, updated the
SPEC/openafs.spec file to call them and compiled.
The compile went fine, however I'm getting the following e
#x27;re running an SMP kernel. That's been fixed. My
appologies for that.
You can try using the openafs-buildall.sh script which should work
properly.
-derek
Quoting Lee Damon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
openafs-1.4.0rc5-rhel4.1.src.rpm
Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Lee Damon <[EMA
openafs-1.4.0rc5-rhel4.1.src.rpm
Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Lee Damon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [8] ; uname -r
2.6.9-22.ELsmp
In your case, `uname -a` is reporting a UP kernel, so it's building a
UP module. This is not a bug.
ELsmp means a UP kernel?
: || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [8] ; uname -r
2.6.9-22.ELsmp
In your case, `uname -a` is reporting a UP kernel, so it's building a
UP module. This is not a bug.
ELsmp means a UP kernel?
Linux kick0.ee.washington.edu 2.6.9-22.ELsmp #1 SMP Mon Sep 19 18:00:54
EDT 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linu
ndard" kernel module.
nomad
Derek Atkins wrote:
What does "uname -r" return? Running the rpmbuild on an x86_64 should
build the userspace RPMS and a kernel module/rpm for the currently running
kernel. If it's an SMP kernel, then it should be an SMP module.
-derek
Quoting Le
nel module/rpm for the currently running
kernel. If it's an SMP kernel, then it should be an SMP module.
-derek
Quoting Lee Damon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This was all compiled in one rpmbuild -ba operation so hopefully it
was all done with the same compiler.
Turns out the rpmbuild did
o way for it to
pick up different compilers, but you never know...
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Lee Damon wrote:
Derek,
In the now successfully rebuilt 1.4.0rc5 SRPM-based RPM for x86_64
everything seems to work except for aklog. It segfaults.
: || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [15] ; which aklog
/usr/bin/ak
attached... I hope. :)
nomad
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Can you provide a back trace from the core file?
Jeffrey Altman
Script started on Mon 31 Oct 2005 02:30:23 PM PST
: || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [1] ; gdb /usr/bin/aklog core.22340
GNU gdb 6.3
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is fr
Derek,
In the now successfully rebuilt 1.4.0rc5 SRPM-based RPM for x86_64
everything seems to work except for aklog. It segfaults.
: || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [15] ; which aklog
/usr/bin/aklog
: || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ [16] ; rpm -qf /usr/bin/aklog
openafs-krb5-1.4.0rc5-1.1
: || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
I haven't been following this thread at all but if you want I can try to
build these RPMs on the x86_64 box I'm playing with. I don't have a lot
of time to translate instructions in an entire mail thread but if you
have a cookbook you want tested I'm available.
nomad
Derek Atkins wrote:
Quo
> > -> Do I need to deinstall it as a DB host before reimaging?
> How many dbservers do you have?
Three, including this one.
> If there are at least three, you can take
> one down without loss of quorum. Unless the machine will be out of service
> for such a long time that you will reconfigu
I'm about to reimage the root drive on an AFS fs & db server. It's going
from an ancient RH release to RHEL 3 with all new OpenAFS RPMs and such.
I am hoping to do it without having to recreate all of the RO volumes on it.
I'd really appreciate it if people with experience at this kind of upgrade
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, David Botsch wrote:
>
> > See openafs bug #16022 for patches to the rpm spec file which will solve the
> > below (and other problems) that pop up when trying to compile.
>
> That also works (presumably, I haven't tested, it was post 1.2.13)
It works to a point. I am able t
I'm trying to build a set of RPMs from the src.rpm for 1.2.13. I've
edited the spec file to include:
%ifarch x86_64
sysbase=amd64
%endif
(in two places)
so now it finds the amd64 make file. It configures fine. However, while
compiling the first module - MODLOAD-2.4.21-20.EL-amd64-SP -
> Considerable progress has been made converting all the IBM docs into both
> Word and Tex.
>
> Does anyone have a preference?
Those of us who ban the use of proprietary document standards like word's
would most likely prefer the more open and universally-available TeX format.
I know that docume
ete in your /vicepf
> volume?
>
> Noel Burton-Krahn
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> (from
> https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2003-April/008795.html)
> [OpenAFS] problem in vos release
> Lee Damon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:28:38 -0700
>
>
For whatever it is worth I can confirm both the problem and the fix. We
upgraded to Linux 2.4.20-13.7 (Red Hat 7.3) and OpenAFS 1.2.9 and every time
we rebooted the host hung at the "warm shutdown" line.
The hang has not happened since applying the umount.diff patch.
nomad
> On Thu, 22 May 2003
Hi Derek & everyone
> First, please CC openafs-info on your responses to me
Sorry, my error.
> Lee Damon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The metric was df.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# df -k /vicepc
> > Filesystem 1k-blocks
I have a vicepc partition that has a bunch of volumes each of which is
rw with a shadow readonly. When I do a vos listvol /vicepc of that server, I
see things like this:
m.r7.blacsmpich 536872397 RW 12 K On-line
m.r7.blacsmpich.readonly 536872398 RO 12
Is anyone successfully backing up an OpenAFS cell using amanda? Please
contact me off-list.
thanks,
nomad
--- - Lee "nomad" Damon - \
work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
play: [EMAIL PROTECTED]or castle!nomad
26 matches
Mail list logo
